LethalDolphin75 Yes you are correct, we should add here:
https://github.com/allegroai/clearml/blob/400c6ec103d9f2193694c54d7491bb1a74bbe8e8/clearml/automation/optuna/optuna.py#L210
elif isinstance(p, UniformLogarithmicParameterRange): hp_type = 'suggest_float' hp_params = dict(low=p.min_value, high=p.max_value if p.include_max else p.max_value - p.step_size, log=True, step=p.step_size)btw: I'm not sure if the ...

I'm having another problem now because I am using the OptunaOptimizer.

Hmm let me check a sec

Is there a way to connect to the task without initiating a new one without overriding the execution?

You can, but not with automagic, you can manually send metrics/logs...
Does that help? or do we need the automagic?

VexedCat68

a Dataset is published, that activates a Dataset trigger. So if every day I publish one dataset, I activate a Dataset Trigger that day once it's published.

From this description it sounds like you created a trigger cycle, am I missing something ?
Basically you can break the cycle by saying, trigger only on New Dataset with a specific Tag (or create the auto dataset in a different project/sub-project).
This will stop your automatic dataset creation from triggering the "orig...

why are there indefinitely growing anonymous tasks, even after i've closed the main schedulers.

The anonymous Tasks are The Dataset you are creating (a Dataset version is also a Task of a certain type with artifacts, the idea is usually Datasets are created from code, hence the need to combine the two).
Make sense ?

LOL RotundHedgehog76 🙂
Is this okay?
https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/38647316

Oh in that case add --remote-gateway <external_ip> It will connect to the provided address instead of the local one. (you can also add --public-ip which will automatically resolve the public IP of the server

Oh, did you try task.connect_configuration
?
https://allegro.ai/docs/examples/reporting/model_config/#using-a-configuration-file

Nice!

DeterminedToad86
So based on the log it seems the agent is installing:
torch from https://download.pytorch.org/whl/cu102/torch-1.6.0-cp36-cp36m-linux_x86_64.whl
and torchvision from https://torchvision-build.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/1.6.0/gpu/cuda-11-0/torchvision-0.7.0a0%2B78ed10c-cp36-cp36m-manylinux1_x86_64.whl

See in the log:
Warning, could not locate PyTorch torch==1.6.0 matching CUDA version 110, best candidate 1.7.0But torchvision is downloaded from the cuda 11 folder...
I...

Hi @<1524922424720625664:profile|TartLeopard58>
Yes this is the default it is designed to serve multiple models and scale horizontally

Hi JuicyFox94
you pointed to exactly the issue 🙂
In your trains.conf
https://github.com/allegroai/trains/blob/f27aed767cb3aa3ea83d8f273e48460dd79a90df/docs/trains.conf#L94

Could I just build it and log these parameters using

task.set_parameters()

so that I call

task.get_parameters()

later?

instead of manually calling set/get, you call task.connect(some_dict_or_object) , it does both:
When running manually (i.e. without an agent) it logs the keys/values on the Task,
when running with an agents, it takes the values from the backend (Task) and sets them on the dict/object
Make sense ?

Hi! I was wondering why ClearML recognize Scikit-learn scalers as Input Models...

Hi GiganticTurtle0
any joblib.load/save is logged by clearml (it cannot actually differentiate what it is used for ...)
You can of course disable it with Task.init(..., auto_connect_frameworks={'joblib': False})

Oh think I understand you point now.
basically you can:

Create the initial Task, once it is in the system clone it and adjust parameters externally. A simple example here:
https://github.com/allegroai/clearml/blob/0397f2b41e41325db2a191070e01b218251bc8b2/examples/automation/manual_random_param_search_example.py#L41

wdyt?

In case of scalars it is easy to see (maximum number of iterations is a good starting point

Under your profile you should be able to see it

store_code_diff_from_remote

 don't seem to change anything in regards of this issue

Correct, it is always from remote

i'll be using the update_task, that worked just fine, thanks 

 (edite

Sure thing.

ShakyJellyfish91 , I took a quick look at the diff between the versions can you hack a non working version (preferably the latest) and verify the issue for me?

ShakyJellyfish91 can you check if version 1.0.6rc2 can find the changes ?

I had no idea it was going to do that and sent your servers over 1.4M API hits unintentionally

Yeah, that is way too much, I think relates to the frequency it updates the console 😞

Hi WackyRabbit7 ,
Yes we had the same experience with kaggle competitions. We ended up having a flag that skipped the task init :(
Introducing offline mode is on the to do list, but to be honest it is there for a while. The thing is, since the Task object actually interacts with the backend, creating an offline mode means simulation of the backend response. I'm open to hacking suggestions though :)

but when I run the same task again it does not map the keys.. (edited)

SparklingElephant70 what do you mean by "map the keys" ?

And it works correctly when running on my computer, and if I use colab, then for some reason it has no effect.

I think I'm lost on this one, when running in colab, is this continuing a previous experiment ?

Hi @<1577106212921544704:profile|WickedSquirrel54>

We are self hosting it using Docker Swarm

Nice!

and were wondering if this is something that the community would be interested in.

Always!

what did you have in mind? I have to admit I'm not familiar with the latest in Docker swarm but we all lover Docker the product and the company

The problem is, the configuration is loaded at import time, so there is no "time" to pass anything other than environment variable.
That said if the only difference is server config you can use
Task.set_credentials

well from 2 to 30sec is a factor of 15, I think this is a good start 🙂

*Actually looking at the code, when you call Task.create(...) it will always store the diff from the remote server.
Could that be the issue?

To edit the Task's diff:
task.update_task(dict(script=dict(diff='DIFF TEXT HERE')))

Hi LethalDolphin75
I think you are right there isn't one (although I remember a discussion about it...)
Anyhow it will be very easy to implement, just inherit from:
https://github.com/allegroai/clearml/blob/400c6ec103d9f2193694c54d7491bb1a74bbe8e8/clearml/automation/parameters.py#L111
And return the power of the parent value here:
https://github.com/allegroai/clearml/blob/400c6ec103d9f2193694c54d7491bb1a74bbe8e8/clearml/automation/parameters.py#L146
And
https://github.com/allegroai/...

The problem is of course filling in all the configuration details, so that they are viewable.
Other than that, check out:
https://allegro.ai/docs/task.html#trains.task.Task.export_task
https://allegro.ai/docs/task.html#trains.task.Task.import_task
Sounds good ?

Do you mean it recently become part of enterprise version?

I do not think so, but it seems this the support for the open-source is more like a PoC
https://github.com/allegroai/clearml-agent/blob/master/examples/k8s_glue_example.py