IrateDolphin19 ClearML provides for saving files generated as part of your code execution through the https://clear.ml/docs/latest/docs/references/sdk/task#upload_artifact . For your use case, you can have your code thus create the artifact as it runs, you can set the specific storage location when you edit your configuration, through the task's output_uri field.
Does this help?
WittyOwl57 Is that information available for you on each of the compared experiments when you view them individually?
The easy way to do that is to add the desired metrics/params as custom columns, then use the column filters: https://clear.ml/docs/latest/docs/webapp/webapp_exp_table#customizing-the-experiments-table
UnevenDolphin73 Am I missing anything in rephrasing your use case to "Have a single autoscaler service multiple queues" (where the autoscaler resource configuration is, in essence, the pool you mention)?
OutrageousSheep60 You can see https://github.com/allegroai/clearml/issues/724 a discussion on the topic.
TL;DR:
Currently the containing project is available in the UI as a tooltip to the dataset name An alternate "Project view" to the datasets page is in the works
DepressedChimpanzee34 ClearML tries to conserve storage by limiting the history length for debug images (see sdk.metrics.file_history_size https://clear.ml/docs/latest/docs/configs/clearml_conf#sdk-section ), though the history can indeed grow large by setting a large value or using a metric/variant naming scheme to circumvent this limit.
Does your use case call for accessing a specific iteration for all images or when looking at a specific image? Note that the debug image viewer (wh...
GentleSwallow91 For more information, look at what ClearML logs for your experiments: https://docs-testing.allegro.ai/docs/latest/docs/fundamentals/task#logging-task-information
GreasyPenguin14 That's an annoying bug indeed - Thanks for spotting it. If you need to circumvent it before a fix comes out in one of the near releases, you can programatically use the https://clear.ml/docs/latest/docs/references/api/endpoints#post-projectsupdate e.g.from clearml.backend_api.session.client import APIClient client = APIClient() client.projects.update(project='<project ID>', description='My new description')
Note you can get your project's ID either from the webapp URL...
@<1580367723722969088:profile|SmoothDuck83> CSV export is only available for table plots
@<1687643893996195840:profile|RoundCat60> Looks like the docs have not caught up yet with recent structure change in the repo which renamed the 'server' folder to 'apiserver'.
So... the correct link would be None
@<1628927672681762816:profile|GreasyKitten62> When you have specific display considerations, you can implement them through report_table's 'extra_layout' and 'extra_data' parameters
RotundHedgehog76 Have you tried clearml-data add --files .
? (Probably best to try on a smaller subset first)
UnevenDolphin73 I think it'd be easier to track as a separate one.
@<1559349204206227456:profile|BeefyStarfish55> try checking out the general overview on pipelines here , and info on the pipelines UI here .
Each step's arguments (and results) should appear in the steps details panel (which you could then follow to the underlying task for complete, in-depth, details).
AverageRabbit65 Adding to SweetBadger76 's reference, e2e examples are available for the different pipeline implementation methods:
https://clear.ml/docs/latest/docs/guides/pipeline/pipeline_controller
https://clear.ml/docs/latest/docs/guides/pipeline/pipeline_decorator
https://clear.ml/docs/latest/docs/guides/pipeline/pipeline_functions
@<1523701157564780544:profile|TenseOstrich47> This is typically indicative of insufficient server disk space causing ES to go into read-only mode or turn active shards into inactive or unassigned (see FAQ ).
The disk watermarks controlling the ES free-disk constraints are defined by default as % of the disk space (so it might look to you like you still have plenty of space, but ES thinks otherwise). You can configure di...
BattyLion34 Adding to AgitatedDove14 hint. See the following docs page: https://allegro.ai/clearml/docs/docs/deploying_clearml/clearml_config_for_clearml_server.html
MelancholyElk85 Thanks for calling this to attention. What do you think would have made it easier for you to notice the available extended list content?
I would assume that a "type to match" option would also have helped?
Appreciate if you could https://github.com/allegroai/clearml/issues/new/choose so this can be pushed forward.
RotundHedgehog76 Thanks for the spot - seems like docs are wrong, and CLI help is correct: '--skip-docker-network' will NOT pass '--network host' to the docker.
@<1580367723722969088:profile|SmoothDuck83> Not every plot is trivially be formed as a table (i.e. CSV), that's why the JSON export is available for all plots.
What were you considering?
DepressedChimpanzee34 Experience has shown that some mechanisms for mitigating large sets impact on browser performance are required.
Your 2nd suggestion for adding an in-app search tool for such sections seems to be completely in line with ClearML's behaviour in other UI sections (e.g. console logs) - It'd be great if you can https://github.com/allegroai/clearml/issues/new/choose
UnsightlySeagull42 The upgrade process is slightly different depending on the environment in which you've deployed your ClearML server (e.g. for a https://allegro.ai/clearml/docs/docs/deploying_clearml/clearml_server_linux_mac.html#upgrading ).
Note the document you are referring to only applies once when you're moving from the older pre-0.16 versions in which case DB migration is required.
If your server is more up to date (0.16 and newer) you should be OK with the link above.
From the https://github.com/allegroai/trains-server/releases/tag/0.13.0 :
Reports average load metrics per day (CPU/memory) Reports average workload per day (amount and average duration of queues, agents and experiments)
DefeatedCrab47 Thanks for pointing it out.
We'll get in touch with the PyTorch Lightning team to better understand the code restructure they're effecting (see https://github.com/PyTorchLightning/pytorch-lightning/pull/2384 ).
In the mean time, you can look at the prior version: https://github.com/PyTorchLightning/pytorch-lightning/blob/0.8.1/pytorch_lightning/loggers/trains.py
HappyDove3 Notice that in https://github.com/allegroai/clearml/issues/400 the goal is to see a table plot in the UI scalars tab for a specific experiment (with additional discussions on how these will be addressed when comparing experiments).
Note that once you take the approach you suggested of logging your metrics single values, you can configure your experiment comparison scalars view to show single values instead of the time-series graph which I think will provide you with the matrix c...
Hi JuicyOtter4
The GUI search returns all experiments in the project that have your search string in their task id, name, description or any of their models' names.
You can use regex with the '.*' button in the search bar.
Take a look at https://clear.ml/docs/latest/docs/pipelines/pipelines_sdk_tasks#running-the-pipeline ;
By default pipelines are enqueued for execution by a ClearML Agent. You can explicitly change this behaviour in your code.
DepressedChimpanzee34 Apologies for missing your previous comment.
Totally agree that the global selection indicator should maintain its 'clear selection' behaviour even if some/all of the selection is off-screen.
UnevenDolphin73 Well... not right now... Currently the ClearML UI only partitions internal artifact types.
That said, having user-defined artifact groups sure sounds worth looking into - Care to https://github.com/allegroai/clearml/issues/new/choose ?