AgitatedDove14 just a reminder if you missed this question 😄
I have a single IAM, my question is what kind of permissions I should associate with the IAM so that the autoscaler task will work
it seems that only the packages that are on the script are getting installed
Now I remind you that using the same credentials exactly, the auto scaler task could launch instances before
actually i was thinking about model that werent trained uaing clearml, like pretrained models etc
Yes, I'll prepare something and send
it's double weird, because also a task that the pipeline says is "in progress" is actually completed
I was refering to what is the returned object of Task.artifacts['...']
- when I call .get
I understand what I get, I'm asking because I want to see how the object I'm calling .get
on behaves
Do you have any idea as to why does that happen SuccessfulKoala55
AgitatedDove14 all I did was to cerate this metric as "last" and then turned on the "max" and "min" and then turned them off
I can't reproduce it now but:
I restarted the services and it didn't help I deleted the columns, and created them again after a while and it helped
It's kind of random, it works sometimes and sometimes it doesn't
So prior to doing any work on the trains autoscaler servcice, I should first create a auto scaling group in AWS?
The weirdest thing, is that the execution is "completed" but it actually failed
but the task pending says its in the queue
SuccessfulKoala55 , I get a list of 1 value. This value is a dictionary which has the keys type
header
and cells
. cells
is a dictionary in itself which has the keys height
values
align
line
font
But I'm naive enough to believe that 10.2 is compatible with 10.1 as it is a minor upgrade
Or should I change all three of them?
I'm really confused, I'm not sure what is wrong and what is the relationship between the templates the agent and all of those thing
For the meantime, I'm giving up on the pipeline thing and I'll write a bash script to orchestrate the execution, because I need to deliver and I'm not feeling this is going anywhere
On an end note I'd love for this to work as expected, I'm not sure what you need from me. A fully reproducible example will be hard because obviously this is proprietary code. What ...
Is there a way to do so without touching the config? directly through the Task object?
Especially coming from the standpoint of a team leader or other kind of supervision (or anyone who wants to view the experiment which is not the code author), when looking at an experiment you want to see the actual code
That's a fix, but I think it is a basic feature and very usefull to see the actual code in the UI