Reputation
Badges 1
11 × Eureka!ugh too bad. I changed the name of one of my metrics and now It's difficult to compare. It would help if it was possible (even by renaming metrics)
Thanks for the awesome work!!!
Is the trains-server release backwards-compatible with earlier versions of trains?
I doesn't really matter to me. One solution I had in mind is that this can be done by the web client on demand, meaning you can manually (or using the Task
object) specify how many iteration constitute a single epoch, and instead of scaling the plots will just be subsampled (or interpolated)
right now the situation is problematic, because as I mentioned, I can't compare the training process between different batch sizes (or effective batch size, if I use a different number of GPUs)
thanks! so basically for experiments that are already finished I have no way to compare ATM, right?
because series
in already used. Think of something like showing debug images based on 2 independent parameters for the model
I need to group images in a similiar way to what is done by iteration
, but based on a string value which will be visible in the UI
The iteration
in my use case doesn't make much sense (I'm evaluation a model)