Oh, btw, I assume you mean http://clear.ml , not http://clearml.ml ?
SmallDeer34 I have to admit this reference is relatively old, maybe we should update to auther http://clearml.ml (would that make sense ?)
Thanks SmallDeer34 !
Would you like us to? How about a footnote/acknowledgement?
How about a reference / footnote ?@misc{clearml, title = {ClearML - Your entire MLOps stack in one open-source tool}, year = {2019}, note = {Software available from
}, url={
}, author = {allegro.ai}, }
Oh, and good job starting your reference with an author that goes early in the alphabetical ordering, lol:
LOL, worst case it would have been C ... 🙂
Oh, and good job starting your reference with an author that goes early in the alphabetical ordering, lol:
Or do you just want:@misc{clearml, title = {ClearML - Your entire MLOps stack in one open-source tool}, year = {2019}, note = {Software available from
}, url={
}, author = {ClearML}, }
Or we could do@misc{clearml, title = {ClearML - Your entire MLOps stack in one open-source tool}, year = {2019}, note = {Software available from
}, url={
}, author = {Allegro AI}, }
Sure, if you want to give up that first-place spot! 😉
I'll make sure we add the reference somewhere on GitHub
BTW, http://clear.ml has this at the bottom:
BTW,Â
 has this at the bottom:
Yes, it is the company legal entity name. But I think that for refrencing it makes more sense to mention the product name ClearML
I think this looks good 🙂