More than the documentation, my main issue was that naming executed is far too vague.. Maybe something like executed_task_id or something along that line is more appropriate. 👍
Hi DeliciousBluewhale87
Yes that should have worked, can you verify the task status ?
Print(Task.get_task(...).get_status())
AgitatedDove14
Just figured it out..
node.base_task_id is the base task, which will always be in draft mode, Instead we should use the node.executed which references the current executed node.
DeliciousBluewhale87
node.base_task_id
is the base task, which will always be in draft mode, Instead we should use the
node.executed
which references the current executed node.
YES, maybe we should add that into the example, so it is clearer ? WDYT?