Thanks for the quick replay.
This will set more time before the timeout right?

Maybe there is a way to do something like:
task.freeze_monitor() download() task.defrost_monitor()

I am sure you add this timeout for a reason.

Probably since increasing the timeout can affect other functionality. .

Am I wrong?

Hi CooperativeFox72
Sure 🙂
task.set_resource_monitor_iteration_timeout(seconds_from_start=1800)

This will set more time before the timeout right?

Correct.

task.freeze_monitor()
download()
task.defrost_monitor()

Currently there isn't, but that's a good ides.
What would be the argument of using it vs increasing the timeout ?
btw: setting the resource timeout to 99999 will basically mean that it will wait until the first reported iteration, Not that it will just sleep for 99999sec 🙂

The main reason to add the timeout is because the warning was annoying to users 🙂
The secondary was that clearml will start reporting based on seconds from start, then when iterations start it will revert back to iterations. But if the iterations are "epochs" the numbers are lower so you end up with a graph that does not match the expected "iterations" x-axis. Make sense ?

OK thanks for the answer.. I will use
task.set_resource_monitor_iteration_timeout(seconds_from_start=1800)as you suggested for now..

If you will add something like I suggest can you notify me?