Examples: query, "exact match", wildcard*, wild?ard, wild*rd
Fuzzy search: cake~ (finds cakes, bake)
Term boost: "red velvet"^4, chocolate^2
Field grouping: tags:(+work -"fun-stuff")
Escaping: Escape characters +-&|!(){}[]^"~*?:\ with \, e.g. \+
Range search: properties.timestamp:[1587729413488 TO *] (inclusive), properties.title:{A TO Z}(excluding A and Z)
Combinations: chocolate AND vanilla, chocolate OR vanilla, (chocolate OR vanilla) NOT "vanilla pudding"
Field search: properties.title:"The Title" AND text
Another Qn, Currently When Building Pipelines. We Use Python Codes As Steps. Is It Possible To Substitute These Steps Using Containers Instead. The Main Reason, Being This Will Be Much More Faster Than In Each Step Vs (Building Docker Image And Running Co

Another qn, currently when building pipelines. We use python codes as steps. Is it possible to substitute these steps using containers instead. The main reason, being this will be much more faster than in each step vs (building docker image and running codes)

Posted 2 years ago
Votes Newest

Answers 2

Hi, using the pipeline examples, with
step1_dataset_artifact.py, step2_data_processing.py, step3_train_model.py ==> pipeline_controller.pyIn the above example, the pipeline_controller is stringing together 3 python files, instead could it string together 3 containers instead. Of course, we can manually compile each into a docker image, but does clearml has some similar approach baked in.

Posted 2 years ago

Is it possible to substitute these steps using containers instead.

I'm not sure I follow, could you expand ?

Posted 2 years ago
2 Answers
2 years ago
8 months ago