Are you inheriting from their docker file ?

MagnificentSeaurchin79 no need for the detection api (yes definitely a mess to setup), it will be more helpful to get a toy example.

Hi SuperiorCockroach75
You mean like turning on caching ? What do you mean by taking too long?

So I think it makes more sense in this case to work with the former.

Totally !

Yes it does. I'm assuming each job is launched using a multiprocessing.Pool (which translates into a sub process). Let me see if I can reproduce this behavior.

Hi ExasperatedCrocodile76
This is quite the hack, but doable 🙂
`
file_path = task.connect_configuration(name = 'augmentations', configuration = 'augmentations.py')

import importlib

module_name = 'augmentations'

spec = importlib.util.spec_from_file_location(module_name, file_path)
module = importlib.util.module_from_spec(spec)
spec.loader.exec_module(module) `
https://stackoverflow.com/a/54956419

PS. I just noticed that this function is not documented. I'll make sure it appears in the doc-string.

@<1570220844972511232:profile|ObnoxiousBluewhale25> it creates a new Model here
None
If you want it to log to something other than the default file server create the clearml Task before starting the training:

task = Task.init(..., outout_uri="file:///home/karol/data/")
# now training

It will use the existing Task and upload to the destination folder

I did nothing to generate a command-line. Just cloned the experiment and enqueued it. Used the server GUI.

Who/What created the initial experiment ?

I noticed that if I run the initial experiment by "python -m folder_name.script_name"

"-m module" as script entry is used to launch entry points like python modules (which is translated to "python -m script")
Why isn't the entry point just the python script?
The command line arguments are passed as arguments on the Args section of t...

How are you spinning the agents ?

Hi ClumsyElephant70
What's the clearml you are using ?
(The first error is a by product of python process.Event created before a forkserver is created, some internal python issue. I thought it was solved, let me take a look at the code you attached)

The additional edges in the graph suggest that these steps somehow contain dependencies that I do not wish them to have.

PanickyMoth78 I think I understand what you are saying, but it is hard to see if there is a "bug" here or a feature...
Can you post the full code of the pipline?

I think task.init flag would be great!

👍

Hi @<1689808977149300736:profile|CharmingKoala14> , let me double check that

I suppose the same would need to be done for any 

client 

PC running 

clearml

 such that you are submitting dataset upload jobs?

Correct

That is, the dataset is perhaps local to my laptop, or on a development VM that is not in the 

clearml

 system, but I from there I want to submit a copy of a dataset, then I would need to configure the storage section in the same way as well?

Correct

Hi ImpressionableRaven99
In the UI the re is a download button when you hover over the graph.
Are you asking if there is a programmatic interface?
What is the use case for all experiments ?

I have install a python environment by virtualenv tool, let's say

/home/frank/env

and python is

/home/frank/env/bin/python3.

How to reuse the virtualenv by setting clearml agent?

So the agent is already caching the entire venv for you, nothing to worry about, just make sure you have this line in clearml:
https://github.com/allegroai/clearml-agent/blob/249b51a31bee97d63f41c6d5542e657962008b68/docs/clearml.conf#L131
No need to provide it an existing...

GiddyTurkey39 what do you have in the Task itself
(i.e. git repo uncommitted changes installed packages)

sdk.storage.cache.size.cleanup_margin_percent

Hi ReassuredTiger98
This is actually future proofing the cache mechanism and allowing it be "smarter" i.e. clean based on cache folder size instead of cache folder entries, this is currently not available

sdk.storage.cache

 parameters for the agent?

For both local execution and with an agent

When are datasets deleted if I run local execution?

When you hit the cache entry limit (100 if I recall). This can a...

Hi @<1557899668485050368:profile|FantasticSquid9>
There is some backwards compatibility issue with 1.2 (I think).
Basically what you need it to spin a new one on a new session ID and rergister the endpoints

This will mount the trains-agent machine's hosts file into the docker

Hi ContemplativePuppy11
This is really interesting point.
Maybe you can provide a pseudo class abstract of your current pipeline design, this will help in trying to understand what you are trying to achieve and how to make it easier to get there

the separate experiments are not starting back at iteration 0

What do you mean by that?

Hi RoughTiger69
A. Yes makes total sense . Basically you can use Task.export Task.import to do achieve this process (notice we assume the dataset artifacts links are available on both, usually this is the case)

B. The easiest way would be to use Process , then one subprocess is exporting from dev , where the credentials and configuration is passed with os environment. The another subprocess imports it to the prod server (again with os environment pointing to the prod server). Make sense?

Legit, if you have a cached_file (i.e. exists and accessible), you can return it to the caller

Hi SourSwallow36
What do you man by Log each experiment separately ? How would you differentiate between them?

Ok, I think figured it out.

Nice!

ClearML doesn't add all the imported packages needed to run the task to the Installed Packages

It does (but not derivative packages, that are used by the required packages, the derivative packages will be added when the agent is running it, because it creates a new clean venv and then it add the required packages, then it updates back with everything in pip freeze, because it now represents All the packages the Task needs)

Two questions:
Is t...

That somehow the PV never worked and it was all local inside the pod

is this a config file on your side or something I can change, if we had enterprise version?

Yes, this is one of the things you can configure

I see it's a plotly plot, even though I report a matplotlib one

ClearML tries to convert matplotlib into plotly objects so they are interactive, it it fails it falls back into a static image as in matplotlib