Reputation
Badges 1
195 × Eureka!AgitatedDove14 , missed your message, python
and then second part is to check if it is up and alive
it is good enough for my current needs, thanks!
FrothyDog40 ,ClearML tries to conserve storage by limiting the history length for debug images (see sdk.metrics.file_history_size configuration entry), though the history can indeed grow large by setting a large value or using a metric/variant naming scheme to circumvent this limit.I am aware, but I am not sure what did you try to say by thisDoes your use case call for accessing a specific iteration for all images or when looking at a specific image?Yes, for some cases I would like...
so if I wait a few minutes I will be able to get the latest version?
FrothyDog40 , done 🙂
https://github.com/allegroai/clearml/issues/474
it happens on task init
client has the following attributes:['auth', 'events', 'models', 'projects', 'queues', 'session', 'tasks', 'workers']
some arbitrary job.. can be executed in parallel to a running job on the same agent.
directly from the UI from the services queue?
CostlyOstrich36 thanks, is there an example for using the post\get in a pythonic way to access the mentioned debug.ping ?
I tried also with the app website..
Why do you need to have the configuration added manually ? isn't the cleaml.conf easier ? If not I think OS environments are easier no?- well at this point I'm not sure it is still essential, we have 3 run-modes offline, local-server, cloud-sever and this option made it work for all of them.. can be that it is not required anymore and its just legacy..
I run run above code, everything worked with no exception/warning...- this is strange.. you ran it with the dataclass config I added?
What is ...
this one is with the brave browser but I get the same with chrome
or should it be assigned somewhere
AgitatedDove14What I'm looking here is some logic that will allow us not to break backwards compatibility on the one hand, but still will allow you to have something like "first\second" entry. WDYT? any ideas? (I really want to make sure we fix it as soon as possible)Do you mean something like the dictionary structure?
I am not sure about a clean elegant solution yet.. but this patch does some of the job:str('(' + ', '.join([str(elm) for elm in tuple_value])+')')I am actually curio...
AgitatedDove14 , done
https://github.com/allegroai/clearml/issues/473
I wasn't familiar with 4. that's great!
Another option is to pull Tasks from a dedicated queue and use the LocalClearMLJob to spwan themThis sounds like it can work. we are talking about something like:
` #<Machine 1>
#Init Optimizer with some dedicated queue
<Machine 2>
heavy one time Common Initialization
while True:
# sample queue
# enqueue with LocalClearMLJob
# Execute Something
# report results
<Machine i>
heavy one time Common Initialization
while True:
# sample same queue
# enqueue wi...
AgitatedDove14 in terms of explicit reporting I'm using the current_epoch which is correct when I check it in debug mode
AgitatedDove14 should be, I'll try to create a small example later today or tomorrow
It does, I am familiar with it I used it many times
if preferred I can open a Github issue about this
ohh actually I think I remember, when you connect a dictionary, the local dtype is used for the casting of the remote matching key (probably more nuanced)