The original file sizes are the same but the compressed sizes seem to be different.

The verbose output:

Generating SHA2 hash for 123 files
100%|██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████| 123/123 [00:00<00:00, 310.04it/s]
Hash generation completed
Add 2022-12.csv
Add 2020-10.csv
Add 2021-06.csv
Add 2022-02.csv
Add 2021-04.csv
Add 2013-03.csv
Add 2021-02.csv
Add 2015-02.csv
Add 2016-07.csv
Add 2022-05.csv
Add 2021-10.csv
Add 2018-04.csv
Add 2019-06.csv
Add 2017-11.csv
Add 2016-01.csv
Add 2013-06.csv
Add 2018-08.csv
Add 2020-05.csv
Add 2020-03.csv
Add 20...

This is odd, the ordering of the files is different and there appears to be some missing from the preview. But as far as I can tell the files aren't different. What am I missing here?

@<1523701435869433856:profile|SmugDolphin23> I spoke too soon. It does resolve the error I posted but it introduces a new error. While this error does seem to be related to VS Code the strange thing is it doesn't occur if I run it with earlier versions of clearml .

The above exception was the direct cause of the following exception:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/natephysics/.vscode-server/extensions/ms-python.python-2023.22.1/pythonFiles/lib/python/debugpy/_vendo...

Yes.

You might want to start with the first steps guide then:
None

Thanks for your reply @<1523701070390366208:profile|CostlyOstrich36> Is there an example where a pipeline is built from existing tasks? I'd like to experiment with it and I don' t see any examples of what you describe with my (clearly lacking) google-fu. What happens if you wrap a function with a task.init() with a pipeline decorator or is that the process you're speaking of?

The plot thickens. It seems like there's something odd going on with the interaction between [LTV] and additional text. If I just search [LTV] it works, if I just search Dataset Test it works, but if I put them together it breaks the search. Now that I think about it, there's other oddities that seem to happen in the web interface that might be explained by some bugs around using brackets in names.

Should I post this in dev?

Thanks for the reply @<1523701070390366208:profile|CostlyOstrich36> !

It says in the documentation that:
Add a folder into the current dataset. calculate file hash, and compare against parent, mark files to be uploaded

It seems to recognize the dataset as another version of the data but doesn't seem to be validating the hashes on a per file basis. Also, if you look at the photo, it seems like some of the data does get recognized as the same as the prior data. It seems like it's the correct...

What version of ClearML server are you using?

Looks good 😄

Will this return a list of datasets?

Yes, it indeed appears to be a regex issue. If I run:

Dataset.list_datasets(
                dataset_project=self.task.get_project_name(),
                partial_name=re.escape('[LTV] Dataset Test'),
                only_completed=True,
            )

It works as expected. I'm not sure how raw you want to leave the partial_name features. I could create a PR to fix this but would you want me to re.escape at the list_datasets() level? Or go deeper and do it at `Task._query_task...

I have manually verified that the line-by-line content of the csv files is identical using hashlib.sha256(). Why would it be that the file content is the same, they are generated by the same process (literally just rerunning the same code twice) but ClearML treats them differently.

Thanks Martin. I read this method as "getting the data associated with the model training" not "getting metadata for the model". This is what I'm looking for.

Alright, I'll try and put that together for Monday.

I will add a gh issue. Is this part open source? Could I make a PR?

In the mean time I still need to implement this with the current version of ClearML. So the only way would be to have one variable per parent? Is there any smarter way to work around it?

I think this error occurred for me because when I first authenticated with the project I was using username/password and later I transitioned to using ssh keys. That's why clearing the cache worked.

Did you validate that branch exists on remote?

I see. Thanks for the insight. That seems to be the case. I'm struggling a bit with datasets. For example, if I wanted to trace the genealogy of a dataset that's used by traditional tasks and pipelines. I'll try and write something up about the challenges around that when I get the chance. But your comment revealed another issue:

It appears that the partial name matching isn't going well. I'm unclear why this wouldn't be matching. In the attached photo you can see the input for `partial_nam...

In this case it's the ID of the "output" model from the first task.

1707128614082 bigbrother:gpu0 INFO task 59d23c5919b04fd6947c1e463fa8c78c pulled from 9890a035b8f84872ab18d7ff207c26c6 by worker bigbrother:gpu0

Current configuration (clearml_agent v1.7.0, location: /tmp/.clearml_agent.vo_oc47r.cfg):
----------------------
agent.worker_id = bigbrother:gpu0
agent.worker_name = bigbrother
agent.force_git_ssh_protocol = true
agent.python_binary = /home/natephysics/anaconda3/bin/python
agent.package_manager.type = pip
agent.package_manager.pip_version.0 = ...

Is it possible the cached repository was cloned before you changed your agent settings?

Which settings are you referring to? I can't remember if I was using https auth when the project would have been first cached. Would that make a difference?

Also, did you set

agent.enable_git_ask_pass: true

?

The only instance of it in the config is commented out.

    # if set, use GIT_ASKPASS to pass user/pass when cloning / fetch repositories
    # it solves pas...

Alright, I tried testing it out by commenting out the code for generating new csv's, so for successive runs the CSVs are identical. However, when I use dataset.add_files() it still generated a new version of the dataset.

# log the data to ClearML if a task is passed
        if self.task:
            self.clearml_dataset = Dataset.create(dataset_name="[LTV] Dataset")
            self.clearml_dataset.add_files(path=save_path, verbose=True)
            if self.tags is not None:
          ...

Hi again @<1523701435869433856:profile|SmugDolphin23> ,

The approach you suggested seems to be working albeit with one issue. It does correctly identify the different versions of the dataset when new data is added, but I get an error when I try and finalize the dataset:

Code:

        if self.task:
            # get the parent dataset from the project
            parent = self.clearml_dataset = Dataset.get(
                dataset_name="[LTV] Dataset",
                dataset_project=...

Ah, that makes sense. What is supposed to be hidden changes depending on the section your in, which makes sense. Now there needs to a packman sprite easter egg hidden somewhere else.

It's a corporate one. We are also looking into options on Github's end.

Since this could happen with a lot of services, maybe it would be worth a retry option? Especially if it's part of a pipeline.

I figured you'd say that so I went ahead with that PR. I got it working but I'm going to test it a bit further.

Sure. I'm in Europe but we can also test things async.