Examples: query, "exact match", wildcard*, wild?ard, wild*rd
Fuzzy search: cake~ (finds cakes, bake)
Term boost: "red velvet"^4, chocolate^2
Field grouping: tags:(+work -"fun-stuff")
Escaping: Escape characters +-&|!(){}[]^"~*?:\ with \, e.g. \+
Range search: properties.timestamp:[1587729413488 TO *] (inclusive), properties.title:{A TO Z}(excluding A and Z)
Combinations: chocolate AND vanilla, chocolate OR vanilla, (chocolate OR vanilla) NOT "vanilla pudding"
Field search: properties.title:"The Title" AND text
Answered
Please Tell Me, Is The Limit Of 10 Copies For Comparison, Is It Ideological Or Can It Be Changed Somehow?

Please tell me, is the limit of 10 copies for comparison, is it ideological or can it be changed somehow?

  
  
Posted 2 years ago
Votes Newest

Answers 12


AgitatedDove14
Returning to this question, tell me please. when it will be possible to expand this limit, in cases where you run 20-30 runs to enumerate one parameter, it is not very convenient to compare them in batches of 10 experiments.
Is it possible to make a checkbox in the profile settings. which would answer az the maximum limit for comparison?

This feature is becoming more and more relevant.

  
  
Posted 2 years ago

Quick follow-up on this topic.

Has the "compare more than 10 run" feature been added in the past 2 months? I can't find any info about this.

  
  
Posted 2 years ago

Up, thanks!

  
  
Posted 2 years ago

AgitatedDove14
I want to be able to compare scalars of more than 10 experiments, otherwise there is no strong need yet

  
  
Posted 2 years ago

AgitatedDove14
please tell me, is the approximate date already known when this feature will be released along with the release?)

  
  
Posted 2 years ago

amazing! thank you

  
  
Posted 2 years ago

Is it possible to make a checkbox in the profile settings. which would answer az the maximum limit for comparison?

This feature is becoming more and more relevant.

So we are working on a better UI for it, so that this is not limited (it's actually the UI that is the limit here)
specifically you can add custom columns to the experiment table (like accuracy loss etc), and sort based on those (multiple values are also supported, just hold the Shift-Key). This way you can quickly explore a lot of experiments.
Regrading when the UI issue will be solved, I'm hoping next version (not the one that is due to be released in a week or so, but the one after)

  
  
Posted 2 years ago

Hi CheerfulGorilla72

is it ideological...
Lol, no 😀
Since some of the comparisons are done client side (browser, mostly the text comparisons) it is a bit heavy , so we added a limit. We want to change it so it does some on the backend, but in the meantime we can actually expand the limit, and maybe only lazy compare the text areas. Hopefully in the next version 🤞

  
  
Posted 2 years ago

Hi Guys,
I hear you guys, and I know this is planned but probably bump down priority.
I know the main issue is the "Execution Tab" comparison, the rest is not an issue.
Maybe a quick Hack to only compare the first 10 in the Execution, and remove the limit on the others ? (The main isue with the execution is the git-diff / installed packages comparison that is quite taxing on the FE)
Thoughts ?

  
  
Posted 2 years ago

I want to be able to compare scalars of more than 10 experiments, otherwise there is no strong need yet

Make sense, in the next version, not the one that will be released next week, the one after with reports (shhh do tell anyone 🙂 ) , they tell me this is solved 🎊

  
  
Posted 2 years ago

CheerfulGorilla72 as I understand there were some delays wit the current release, so it is going to be out this week. The one after that includes this feature and as far as I understand would be mid Dec.

  
  
Posted 2 years ago

AgitatedDove14 ^
me too

  
  
Posted 2 years ago
1K Views
12 Answers
2 years ago
one year ago
Tags