Hi CheerfulGorilla72
is it ideological...
Lol, no 😀
Since some of the comparisons are done client side (browser, mostly the text comparisons) it is a bit heavy , so we added a limit. We want to change it so it does some on the backend, but in the meantime we can actually expand the limit, and maybe only lazy compare the text areas. Hopefully in the next version 🤞
AgitatedDove14
Returning to this question, tell me please. when it will be possible to expand this limit, in cases where you run 20-30 runs to enumerate one parameter, it is not very convenient to compare them in batches of 10 experiments.
Is it possible to make a checkbox in the profile settings. which would answer az the maximum limit for comparison?
This feature is becoming more and more relevant.
Is it possible to make a checkbox in the profile settings. which would answer az the maximum limit for comparison?
This feature is becoming more and more relevant.
So we are working on a better UI for it, so that this is not limited (it's actually the UI that is the limit here)
specifically you can add custom columns to the experiment table (like accuracy loss etc), and sort based on those (multiple values are also supported, just hold the Shift-Key). This way you can quickly explore a lot of experiments.
Regrading when the UI issue will be solved, I'm hoping next version (not the one that is due to be released in a week or so, but the one after)
Quick follow-up on this topic.
Has the "compare more than 10 run" feature been added in the past 2 months? I can't find any info about this.
Hi Guys,
I hear you guys, and I know this is planned but probably bump down priority.
I know the main issue is the "Execution Tab" comparison, the rest is not an issue.
Maybe a quick Hack to only compare the first 10 in the Execution, and remove the limit on the others ? (The main isue with the execution is the git-diff / installed packages comparison that is quite taxing on the FE)
Thoughts ?
I want to be able to compare scalars of more than 10 experiments, otherwise there is no strong need yet
Make sense, in the next version, not the one that will be released next week, the one after with reports (shhh do tell anyone 🙂 ) , they tell me this is solved 🎊
AgitatedDove14
I want to be able to compare scalars of more than 10 experiments, otherwise there is no strong need yet
CheerfulGorilla72 as I understand there were some delays wit the current release, so it is going to be out this week. The one after that includes this feature and as far as I understand would be mid Dec.
AgitatedDove14
please tell me, is the approximate date already known when this feature will be released along with the release?)