Examples: query, "exact match", wildcard*, wild?ard, wild*rd
Fuzzy search: cake~ (finds cakes, bake)
Term boost: "red velvet"^4, chocolate^2
Field grouping: tags:(+work -"fun-stuff")
Escaping: Escape characters +-&|!(){}[]^"~*?:\ with \, e.g. \+
Range search: properties.timestamp:[1587729413488 TO *] (inclusive), properties.title:{A TO Z}(excluding A and Z)
Combinations: chocolate AND vanilla, chocolate OR vanilla, (chocolate OR vanilla) NOT "vanilla pudding"
Field search: properties.title:"The Title" AND text
Answered
Performance Of Project Overview

Performance of project overview
We see some performance issues with the projects list in the Web UI. When there are lots of sub projects the server response from projects.get_all_ex grows to > 1 MB for us and takes a couple of seconds. Mainly because of the "sub_projects" field of each top level project in the response.
I did not dig deeper yet and just wanted to ask:
Are these performance issues known? Can we somehow work around it? Why does the sub project counter list all projects and not just the next child projects? It seems unnecessarily costly to list all leaves when you have a deeply nested tree of projects.
If preferred I will create a Github issue and dig a bit deeper.

  
  
Posted 2 years ago
Votes Newest

Answers 2


Hi AdorableSheep95 , This is indeed a know issue, and we would appreciate a Git issue so we can track it (and fix it 🙂 )

  
  
Posted 2 years ago

Thanks
I created one in clearml-web. Let me know when I can help you there somehow
https://github.com/allegroai/clearml-web/issues/32

  
  
Posted 2 years ago
1K Views
2 Answers
2 years ago
one year ago
Tags
Similar posts