Examples: query, "exact match", wildcard*, wild?ard, wild*rd
Fuzzy search: cake~ (finds cakes, bake)
Term boost: "red velvet"^4, chocolate^2
Field grouping: tags:(+work -"fun-stuff")
Escaping: Escape characters +-&|!(){}[]^"~*?:\ with \, e.g. \+
Range search: properties.timestamp:[1587729413488 TO *] (inclusive), properties.title:{A TO Z}(excluding A and Z)
Combinations: chocolate AND vanilla, chocolate OR vanilla, (chocolate OR vanilla) NOT "vanilla pudding"
Field search: properties.title:"The Title" AND text
Answered
Hi, I'M Using Hyperparameteroptimizer Alongside Optimizeroptuna And I Am Unsure How To Implement Pruning On Tasks That Are Not Producing Good Results. Is There A Way To Implement This On These Modules?

Hi, I'm using HyperParameterOptimizer alongside OptimizerOptuna and I am unsure how to implement pruning on tasks that are not producing good results. Is there a way to implement this on these modules?

  
  
Posted 2 years ago
Votes Newest

Answers 4


Yeah, I do the same thing all the time. You can limit the amount of tasks that are kept in HPO with the save_top_k_tasks_only parameter and you can create subprojects by simply using a slash in the name 🙂 https://clear.ml/docs/latest/docs/fundamentals/projects#creating-subprojects

  
  
Posted 2 years ago

Hi UnevenBee3 , the OptimizerOptuna class should already be able to prune any bad tasks, provided the model itself is iteration-based (so no SVM etc. need iterations for early stopping). You can read our blogpost here: https://clear.ml/blog/how-to-do-hyperparameter-optimization-better/

  
  
Posted 2 years ago

Thanks, this was really helpful. Would be a good thing to have on the hyperparameter tuning page in the docs if you can add it.

  
  
Posted 2 years ago

Also, I was wondering if there was a way to sort out folders and create a sub folder with the tasks with adjusted hyperparameters so that we can access them but they don't take up quite so much space.

  
  
Posted 2 years ago
1K Views
4 Answers
2 years ago
one year ago
Tags