Examples: query, "exact match", wildcard*, wild?ard, wild*rd
Fuzzy search: cake~ (finds cakes, bake)
Term boost: "red velvet"^4, chocolate^2
Field grouping: tags:(+work -"fun-stuff")
Escaping: Escape characters +-&|!(){}[]^"~*?:\ with \, e.g. \+
Range search: properties.timestamp:[1587729413488 TO *] (inclusive), properties.title:{A TO Z}(excluding A and Z)
Combinations: chocolate AND vanilla, chocolate OR vanilla, (chocolate OR vanilla) NOT "vanilla pudding"
Field search: properties.title:"The Title" AND text
Hello! I'M Running A Task For Which I Want To Log Several Checkpoints Of A Model. I Have A Reason To Save The Checkpoints In Different Folders Locally But Them Having The Same File Name. I Use

I'm running a task for which I want to log SEVERAL checkpoints of a model. I have a reason to save the checkpoints in different folders locally but them having the same file name. I use OutputModel for that and in ClearML WEB UI I see ONLY ONE artifact named similarly to the file name of my checkpoints. In the storage (S3 in my case), however, I see all the checkpoints stored nice and separate. Is that the intended ClearML behaviour? Is there a way that I can upload several different weights files with the same file name and see them as different models on the Artifacts tab in the experiment dashboard?
Please see my code in the thread

Posted one year ago
Votes Newest

Answers 10

filename = './models/v1/model.ckpt' torch.save(state_dict, filename) mv1 = OutputModel(name='model_v1', task=task) mv1.update_weights(filename, upload_uri=my_uri) update_model(mynn.multiplier) state_dict = mynn.state_dict() filename = './models/v2/model.ckpt' torch.save(state_dict, filename) mv2 = OutputModel(name='model_v2', task=task) mv2.update_weights(filename, upload_uri=my_uri)

Posted one year ago

SweetBadger76 Could you please verify if that is what you meant. I'm still confused if I'm doing something wrong or everything works as intended and Clearml discriminates models only by the file name.

Posted one year ago

` # ClearML - Example of Pytorch mnist training integration

from future import print_function
import argparse
import os
from tempfile import gettempdir

import torch
import torch.nn as nn
import torch.nn.functional as F
import torch.optim as optim
from torchvision import datasets, transforms

from clearml import OutputModel
from clearml import Task, Logger
import time

class Net(nn.Module):
def init(self):
super(Net, self).init()
self.conv1 = nn.Conv2d(1, 20, 5, 1)
self.conv2 = nn.Conv2d(20, 50, 5, 1)
self.fc1 = nn.Linear(4 * 4 * 50, 500)
self.fc2 = nn.Linear(500, 10)

def forward(self, x):
    x = F.relu(self.conv1(x))
    x = F.max_pool2d(x, 2, 2)
    x = F.relu(self.conv2(x))
    x = F.max_pool2d(x, 2, 2)
    x = x.view(-1, 4 * 4 * 50)
    x = F.relu(self.fc1(x))
    x = self.fc2(x)
    return F.log_softmax(x, dim=1)

def train(args, model, device, train_loader, optimizer, epoch):
for batch_idx, (data, target) in enumerate(train_loader):
data, target = data.to(device), target.to(device)
output = model(data)
loss = F.nll_loss(output, target)
if batch_idx % args.log_interval == 0:
"train", "loss", iteration=(epoch * len(train_loader) + batch_idx), value=loss.item())
print('Train Epoch: {} [{}/{} ({:.0f}%)]\tLoss: {:.6f}'.format(
epoch, batch_idx * len(data), len(train_loader.dataset),
100. * batch_idx / len(train_loader), loss.item()))

def test(args, model, device, test_loader, epoch):
test_loss = 0
correct = 0
with torch.no_grad():
for data, target in test_loader:
data, target = data.to(device), target.to(device)
output = model(data)
test_loss += F.nll_loss(output, target, reduction='sum').item() # sum up batch loss
pred = output.argmax(dim=1, keepdim=True) # get the index of the max log-probability
correct += pred.eq(target.view_as(pred)).sum().item()

test_loss /= len(test_loader.dataset)

    "test", "loss", iteration=epoch, value=test_loss)
    "test", "accuracy", iteration=epoch, value=(correct / len(test_loader.dataset)))
print('\nTest set: Average loss: {:.4f}, Accuracy: {}/{} ({:.0f}%)\n'.format(
    test_loss, correct, len(test_loader.dataset),
    100. * correct / len(test_loader.dataset)))

def main():
# Connecting ClearML with the current process,
# from here on everything is logged automatically
task = Task.init(project_name='examples', task_name='PyTorch MNIST train')

# Training settings
parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description='PyTorch MNIST Example')
parser.add_argument('--batch-size', type=int, default=64, metavar='N',
                    help='input batch size for training (default: 64)')
parser.add_argument('--test-batch-size', type=int, default=1000, metavar='N',
                    help='input batch size for testing (default: 1000)')
parser.add_argument('--epochs', type=int, default=3, metavar='N',
                    help='number of epochs to train (default: 10)')
parser.add_argument('--lr', type=float, default=0.01, metavar='LR',
                    help='learning rate (default: 0.01)')
parser.add_argument('--momentum', type=float, default=0.5, metavar='M',
                    help='SGD momentum (default: 0.5)')
parser.add_argument('--no-cuda', action='store_true', default=False,
                    help='disables CUDA training')
parser.add_argument('--seed', type=int, default=1, metavar='S',
                    help='random seed (default: 1)')
parser.add_argument('--log-interval', type=int, default=10, metavar='N',
                    help='how many batches to wait before logging training status')

parser.add_argument('--save-model', action='store_true', default=True,
                    help='For Saving the current Model')
args = parser.parse_args()
use_cuda = not args.no_cuda and torch.cuda.is_available()


device = torch.device("cuda" if use_cuda else "cpu")

kwargs = {'num_workers': 4, 'pin_memory': True} if use_cuda else {}
train_loader = torch.utils.data.DataLoader(
    datasets.MNIST(os.path.join('..', 'data'), train=True, download=True,
                       transforms.Normalize((0.1307,), (0.3081,))
    batch_size=args.batch_size, shuffle=True, **kwargs)
test_loader = torch.utils.data.DataLoader(
    datasets.MNIST(os.path.join('..', 'data'), train=False, transform=transforms.Compose([
        transforms.Normalize((0.1307,), (0.3081,))
    batch_size=args.test_batch_size, shuffle=True, **kwargs)

model = Net().to(device)
optimizer = optim.SGD(model.parameters(), lr=args.lr, momentum=args.momentum)

for epoch in range(1, args.epochs + 1):
    train(args, model, device, train_loader, optimizer, epoch)

    test(args, model, device, test_loader, epoch)

state_dict = model.state_dict()
filename = os.path.join(gettempdir(), "mnist_cnn1" + ".pt")
torch.save(state_dict, filename)
mv1 = OutputModel(name='mnist_cnn1', task=task)
filename = os.path.join(gettempdir(), "mnist_cnn2" + ".pt")
torch.save(state_dict, filename)
mv2 = OutputModel(name='mnist_cnn2', task=task)

if name == 'main':
main() `

Posted one year ago

Hi, Erez!
Thank you for the example, I checked it out. It really creates two models. But the thing is, these two models have different file names here. In my scenario, however, it's more convenient for me to have the same file name and different directories for the models. In this case, all my models get overwritten by the latest logged one (as in my screenshot above).
Fortunately, if I use upload_artifact() instead (which I eventually go with) I manage to achieve what I want (see the screenshots below). In my case, it's perfectly enough but I'll be glad to open an issue and describe the bug if it helps

Posted one year ago

Hi SillySealion58 , yeah in that case we only look at the filename and not the full path. Let me see what we can do internally! Thanks and happy you found a workaround 😄

Posted one year ago

Hi SillySealion58
you can discriminate between your output models when you instantiate them. There are like parameters name, tags or comment that all belong to the constructor OutputModel .
It would thus be a way of using the same filename for all the checkpoints, and have them differentiated in the task. Does it make sense ?

Posted one year ago

Thank you but although I'm actually already using the parameter name mentioned in your response in my code, I can see only one model on the task's page

Posted one year ago

Unfortunately, the other parameters like tags and comment didn't help to separate the models

Posted one year ago

Hi SillySealion58 ,
I'm Erez from ClearML! I'm revisiting the way we manage models on tasks and stumbled upon this unanswered question and wanted to help!
The below code works, and creates 2 models. note that we capture the models when you call torch.save() and we save the filename. The filename is also the "name" which you can use to modify models later on. If this is still relevant, would be happy if you could tell me whether it worked!

Posted one year ago

Hi, Erez!
Thank you for your answer! I'll see if it solves the problem

Posted one year ago