Examples: query, "exact match", wildcard*, wild?ard, wild*rd
Fuzzy search: cake~ (finds cakes, bake)
Term boost: "red velvet"^4, chocolate^2
Field grouping: tags:(+work -"fun-stuff")
Escaping: Escape characters +-&|!(){}[]^"~*?:\ with \, e.g. \+
Range search: properties.timestamp:[1587729413488 TO *] (inclusive), properties.title:{A TO Z}(excluding A and Z)
Combinations: chocolate AND vanilla, chocolate OR vanilla, (chocolate OR vanilla) NOT "vanilla pudding"
Field search: properties.title:"The Title" AND text
Unanswered
Hey, Is There An Easy Way To Retrieve The Code Used To Run An Experiment? Without Recreating The Whole Environment Etc. The Problem: I Have Ran A


ExasperatedCrab78 Such a git patch appeared to track a lot of unrelated unexecuted stuff. And was whimsical when being applied - it errored on all those unrelated code files as far as i could tell so i had to use --reject in git apply --reject --whitespace=fix experiment-a1fbb0ecfc4e4d698e017d8356d8be52.patch

I get that this feature is probably coming from a robust reproducibility design perspective. If only there'd be a shortcut tho. For example, official Python VSCode extension has this thing: you can execute select lines of code from a source file via Python Interactive ,and then one can export all the executed code into a standalone notebook (it will not have any other code from the source file).
Gather python VSCode extension does something similair but from notebooks: after you execute cells in the notebook it allows to export all the code that was necessary to execute that cell into a standalone notebook.
Both solutions do not stalk for changes in the whole package and personally i've found them quite enabling.

A good enough solution would be, i think, having an option of listing git diff for each file separately. So I could pick which files i wanna rollback via git apply

  
  
Posted 2 years ago
176 Views
0 Answers
2 years ago
one year ago