SmallDeer34 , just out of curiosity, how many in a single compare would be needed for your use case?

generally I include the random seed in the name

Aggregating the sort of range of all the runs, maybe like a hurricane track?

Well they do all have different names

no maximized:

Or at least not conveniently

maximized:

SmallDeer34 , great, thanks for the info 🙂

SmallDeer34 , and they still have the same colors when you maximize the graph?

SmallDeer34 Hi! 🙂

I'm afraid that currently we support only up to 10 experiments in comparison at once. However you can add/remove experiments mid comparison. Is there a specific reason why you'd need to compare specifically 20?

Regarding the coloring, if you do 5/5 it would be supported.

No, not specifically 20,in fact more than 20

Oh look, the blue setting is best!

As an alternate solution, if I could group runs and get stats across the group, that would be cool

They don't, no

SmallDeer34 , as a workaround for the issue of the graph maximize you can simply rename some of the experiments and this should fix the coloring issue for now until it is fixed in the next version 🙂

something like this is what I'm looking for

And the reason is, because I have a bunch of "runs" with the same settings, and I want to compare broadly across several settings. So if I select "a bunch" with setting A I can see a general pattern when compared with setting B.

I've got 7-10 runs per setting, and about 7 or 8 settings