we can add non-clearml code as a step in the pipeline controller.
Yes 🙂 , btw you can kind of already do that, with pre/post function callbacks (notice they are running from the same scope as the actual pipeline controller).
What exactly did you have in mind to put there ?
Hi AgitatedDove14 ,
At this point, Showing the url of the cleamltask might be sufficient. Unless in the future, someone wants it to be customised.
But the bigger question is if there is tool to aid with this workflow building ? We are currently experimenting with airflow/prefect.
This sounds like a great workflow to implement.
I guess my first question is how do you imagine the manager/director interacting with the system? What will they be shown, to allow them to approve/decline the model promotion ?
One use case now :
Load Data from Label Studio (Manager to manually approve) Push data to Clearml-data Run Training (Manager to manually Publish) Pushes model uri to next step Seldon deploy itLater, if seldon detects a data drift, it will automatically run (steps 2-5)..
At this point, we havent drilled all of it down yet
DeliciousBluewhale87 fyi, the new version of the pipeline (hopefully pushed towards the end of this week), will allow you to more easily write steps as functions (not only as Tasks, as the current implementation)
Also check the new Trigger and Scheduler both intended to trigger these pipelines: