Examples: query, "exact match", wildcard*, wild?ard, wild*rd
Fuzzy search: cake~ (finds cakes, bake)
Term boost: "red velvet"^4, chocolate^2
Field grouping: tags:(+work -"fun-stuff")
Escaping: Escape characters +-&|!(){}[]^"~*?:\ with \, e.g. \+
Range search: properties.timestamp:[1587729413488 TO *] (inclusive), properties.title:{A TO Z}(excluding A and Z)
Combinations: chocolate AND vanilla, chocolate OR vanilla, (chocolate OR vanilla) NOT "vanilla pudding"
Field search: properties.title:"The Title" AND text
Answered
Hi, In This

Hi,
in this https://allegro.ai/blog/accelerate-hyperparameter-optimization-with-pytorchs-ecosystem-tools/ you mention PBT as a possible hyperparameter tuning/technique/scheduler. Does trains support PBT? I am asking because looking at Optuna's API, it https://github.com/optuna/optuna/issues/287#issuecomment-450269160 that they do not support PBT.

  
  
Posted 4 years ago
Votes Newest

Answers 3


Do you have a specific PBT implementation you are considering ?

Yes. Ray has a nice implementation of that and of many other things (It also supports Optuna & BOHB internally). This could relate to a https://github.com/allegroai/trains/issues/227#issuecomment-716513710 I opened in the GIT.

TPE and HBOB are competitive to PBT in terms of performance

Yes, and I believe ASHA is also, but I wanted to compare PBT.

Thanks anyway.

  
  
Posted 4 years ago

Hi OddAlligator72

it 

 that they do not support PBT.

The optimization algorithm themselves are usually external (although the trivial stuff are in within Trains)
Do you have a specific PBT implementation you are considering ?

  
  
Posted 4 years ago

FYI:
TPE and HBOB are competitive to PBT in terms of performance

  
  
Posted 4 years ago