Examples: query, "exact match", wildcard*, wild?ard, wild*rd
Fuzzy search: cake~ (finds cakes, bake)
Term boost: "red velvet"^4, chocolate^2
Field grouping: tags:(+work -"fun-stuff")
Escaping: Escape characters +-&|!(){}[]^"~*?:\ with \, e.g. \+
Range search: properties.timestamp:[1587729413488 TO *] (inclusive), properties.title:{A TO Z}(excluding A and Z)
Combinations: chocolate AND vanilla, chocolate OR vanilla, (chocolate OR vanilla) NOT "vanilla pudding"
Field search: properties.title:"The Title" AND text
Answered
What Sort Of Integration Is Possible With Clearml And Sagemaker? On The Page

What sort of integration is possible with ClearML and SageMaker? On the page describing ClearML Remote it says:

Create a remote development environment (e.g. AWS SageMaker, GCP CoLab, etc.) on any on-prem machine or any cloud.

But the only mention of SageMaker I see in the docs is the release notes for 0.13 saying "Add support for SageMaker".

I have SageMaker Studio up and running with access to my ClearML server and it's successfully able to log plots and scalars from experiments, but in terms of code it just logs the code used to launch the kernel:

"""Entry point for launching an IPython kernel.
This is separate from the ipykernel package so we can avoid doing imports until
after removing the cwd from sys.path.
"""
import sys

if __name__ == '__main__':
    # Remove the CWD from sys.path while we load stuff.
    # This is added back by InteractiveShellApp.init_path()
    if sys.path[0] == '':
        del sys.path[0]
    from ipykernel import kernelapp as app
    app.launch_new_instance()

Is it possible to capture more than that while using SageMaker?

  
  
Posted 2 years ago
Votes Newest

Answers 77


so my reading of the jupyter-kernel-gateway docs is that each session is containerized, so each notebook "session" is totally isolated

  
  
Posted 2 years ago

poking around a little bit, and clearml.backend_interface.task.repo.scriptinfo.ScriptInfo._get_jupyter_notebook_filename() returns None

  
  
Posted 2 years ago

As in, which tab when I'm viewing the Experiment should I see it on? Should it be code, an artifact, or something else?

  
  
Posted 2 years ago

nope, that's wrong

  
  
Posted 2 years ago

if I instead change the request url to f"http://{server_info['hostname']}:{server_info['port']}/api/sessions" then it gets a 200 response... however , the response is an empty list

  
  
Posted 2 years ago

which I looked at previously to see if I could import sagemaker.kg or kernelgateway or something, but no luck

  
  
Posted 2 years ago

Hmm what do you have here?

os.system("cat /var/log/studio/kernel_gateway.log")
  
  
Posted 2 years ago

but even then the sessions endpoint is still empty

  
  
Posted 2 years ago

if I add the base_url it's not found

  
  
Posted 2 years ago

This is very odd ... let me check something

  
  
Posted 2 years ago

@<1532532498972545024:profile|LittleReindeer37> nice!!! 😍
Do you want to PR? it will be relatively easy to merge and test, and I think that they might even push it to the next version (or worst case quick RC)

  
  
Posted 2 years ago

but maybe that doesn't matter, actually - it might be one session per host I guess

  
  
Posted 2 years ago

looks like the same as in server_info

  
  
Posted 2 years ago

so notebook path is empty

  
  
Posted 2 years ago

sounds good, thanks!

  
  
Posted 2 years ago

and cat /var/log/studio/kernel_gateway.log | grep ipynb comes up empty

  
  
Posted 2 years ago

seems like it's using None and that doesn't provide the normal api/sessions endpoint - or, it does, but returns an empty list

  
  
Posted 2 years ago
158K Views
77 Answers
2 years ago
2 years ago
Tags
Similar posts