Examples: query, "exact match", wildcard*, wild?ard, wild*rd
Fuzzy search: cake~ (finds cakes, bake)
Term boost: "red velvet"^4, chocolate^2
Field grouping: tags:(+work -"fun-stuff")
Escaping: Escape characters +-&|!(){}[]^"~*?:\ with \, e.g. \+
Range search: properties.timestamp:[1587729413488 TO *] (inclusive), properties.title:{A TO Z}(excluding A and Z)
Combinations: chocolate AND vanilla, chocolate OR vanilla, (chocolate OR vanilla) NOT "vanilla pudding"
Field search: properties.title:"The Title" AND text
Answered
I noticed that `Task.get_tasks(project_name=project)` is quite slow in my project of over 300 experiments. Is there a faster way of receiving task objects?

I noticed that Task.get_tasks(project_name=project) is quite slow in my project of over 300 experiments. Is there a faster way of receiving task objects?

  
  
Posted 6 months ago
Votes Newest

Answers 8


I ‘ m using the app.clearml server

  
  
Posted 6 months ago

What’s considered large in that case?

  
  
Posted 6 months ago

Anything that will cause slowness when sent from the server - depends where you server is set up etc.

  
  
Posted 6 months ago

I don’t know what would cause slowness

  
  
Posted 6 months ago

In that case since I'm pretty sure these are indexed correctly, I can only assume download time slowness

  
  
Posted 6 months ago

Hem, yeah might be the case.

  
  
Posted 6 months ago

Hi @<1694157594333024256:profile|DisturbedParrot38> , I'm not sure exactly what is the cause for the slow performance, but 300 experiments is fairly small, is it possible the experiments themselves (ie the metadata returned by the call) are large?

  
  
Posted 6 months ago

My experiments are all using YOLOv8 and they contain the data from what is gathered there automatically

  
  
Posted 6 months ago
545 Views
8 Answers
6 months ago
6 months ago
Tags