Examples: query, "exact match", wildcard*, wild?ard, wild*rd
Fuzzy search: cake~ (finds cakes, bake)
Term boost: "red velvet"^4, chocolate^2
Field grouping: tags:(+work -"fun-stuff")
Escaping: Escape characters +-&|!(){}[]^"~*?:\ with \, e.g. \+
Range search: properties.timestamp:[1587729413488 TO *] (inclusive), properties.title:{A TO Z}(excluding A and Z)
Combinations: chocolate AND vanilla, chocolate OR vanilla, (chocolate OR vanilla) NOT "vanilla pudding"
Field search: properties.title:"The Title" AND text
Unanswered
Why Does Clearml Still Waste Time On Requirement Analysis When I Provide Them? Any Tips For How I Can Reduce Clearml Overhead ... (The Time Before Work Actually Starts)?


thanks so much!
I've been running a bunch of tests with timers and seeing an absurd amount of variance. Ive seen parameters connect and task create in seconds and other times it takes 4 minutes.

Since I see timeout connection errors somewhat regularly, I'm wondering if perhaps I'm having networking errors. Is there a way (at the class level) to control the retry logic on connecting to the API server?

my operating theory is that some sort of backoff / timeout (eg 10s) is causing the high variance.

To test this, I spun up a local instance and pointing to localhost as well as the normal reverse-proxy, and found that localhost had "overhead times" that were completely reasonable - practically none at all.

The difference in the two screenshots is literally only the URLs in clearml.conf and it went from 30s down to 2-3s.

(server has been destroyed already, not worried about the keys showing)
image
image

  
  
Posted 5 months ago
70 Views
0 Answers
5 months ago
5 months ago