Examples: query, "exact match", wildcard*, wild?ard, wild*rd
Fuzzy search: cake~ (finds cakes, bake)
Term boost: "red velvet"^4, chocolate^2
Field grouping: tags:(+work -"fun-stuff")
Escaping: Escape characters +-&|!(){}[]^"~*?:\ with \, e.g. \+
Range search: properties.timestamp:[1587729413488 TO *] (inclusive), properties.title:{A TO Z}(excluding A and Z)
Combinations: chocolate AND vanilla, chocolate OR vanilla, (chocolate OR vanilla) NOT "vanilla pudding"
Field search: properties.title:"The Title" AND text
Unanswered
Hi Everyone! I'M Working On A Solution That Uses Clearml Agent Running On An Ec2 Instances. These Instances (And Agents) Are Provisioned Automatically And Listen To A Specific Clearml Queue. Different Users Can Send Jobs To This Queue And Therefore To Th


He's asking "what git credentials make sense to use for agents" - regardless of autoscaling or not. I had the same question earlier.

tldr: it depends on your security policies.

@<1719524650926477312:profile|EncouragingFish95> - if you have the ability to create a "service account" in your git provider, perhaps at the org-level, I would do that.

My org's cloud git provider does not enable this functionality, and so we have agreed that it is "acceptable" to have the agent's git credentials basically be tied to a token for my account (since I'm effectively administrating our server). Since it's read-only (clearml doesnt push commits), it didn't feel particularly important to have identities correctly tied to the agents.

If it's possible to create a user account that multiple trusted people on your team can administrator, then I would do that. read-only auth keys at the repo-level would work too.

(always consider the risk of "how will my team handle this if I am to suddenly leave" and "to what repos does this token grant access")

  
  
Posted 2 months ago
39 Views
0 Answers
2 months ago
2 months ago