Examples: query, "exact match", wildcard*, wild?ard, wild*rd
Fuzzy search: cake~ (finds cakes, bake)
Term boost: "red velvet"^4, chocolate^2
Field grouping: tags:(+work -"fun-stuff")
Escaping: Escape characters +-&|!(){}[]^"~*?:\ with \, e.g. \+
Range search: properties.timestamp:[1587729413488 TO *] (inclusive), properties.title:{A TO Z}(excluding A and Z)
Combinations: chocolate AND vanilla, chocolate OR vanilla, (chocolate OR vanilla) NOT "vanilla pudding"
Field search: properties.title:"The Title" AND text
Unanswered
My Team Uses Metaflow By Outerbounds. Great Dag Tool. Super Robust. We Run Our Production Workloads On It And Use It For Experimentation, Too. I'M Considering Adding Clearml To Our Stack As An Exp Tracker / Model Registry Rather Than Going With The More


you mean as experiment management / model registry / data? I think this is the bread&butter of clearml

💯 . I was wondering if anyone had had experience using ClearML together with one of these others.

I think most of them are alternatives to metaflow

Totally.

Like, if you google "dagster and clearml" or "prefect and clearml" or "airflow and clearml" -- I don't find any blogs written by people talking about how they use both of them together.

That's strange to me, because if you search for "mlflow and ___" you'll nearly always find something.

So my point was: if ClearML can work well with Metaflow, it should be able to work well with any of the others, which I think would be great.

And it also makes me wonder: why?? Why is it that seemingly nobody is using ClearML together with another DAG tool? Does it not make sense for some reason? Or is it that no one has explored it?

Trying to figure that out. It's on my list to try it myself, but may not get to it for a while. We've got some pressure internally to come up with something. The default is MLflow.

  
  
Posted 2 months ago
35 Views
0 Answers
2 months ago
2 months ago