AgitatedDove14 SuccessfulKoala55 I just saw that clearml-server 1.4.0 was released, congrats 🚀 🙌 Was this bug fixed with this new version?

clearml doesn't change the matplotlib backend under the hood, right? Just making sure 😄

There was no possible cache, the agent was running on a new ec2 instance

SuccessfulKoala55 I can try to make one, let’s see 🙂

Does that mean that agents do not read this parameter?

What will this parameter do?

Hi CostlyOstrich36 , this weekend I took a look at the diffs with the previous version ( https://github.com/allegroai/clearml-server/compare/1.1.1...1.2.0# ) and I saw several changes related to the scrolling/logging:
apiserver/bll/event/ http://log_events_iterator.py apiserver/bll/event/ http://events_iterator.py apiserver/config/default/services/_mongo.conf apiserver/database/model/ http://base.py apiserver/services/ http://events.pyI suspect that one of these changes might be responsible ...

using trains RC, trains-agent 0.15.0

so the task they execute must have clearml installed?

Disclaimer: I didn't check this will reproduce the bug, but that's all the components that should reproduce it: a for loop creating figures and clearml logging them

Yes, I would like to update all references to the old bucket unfortunately… I think I’ll simply delete the old s3 bucket, wait or his name to be available again and recreate it where on the other aws account and move the data there. This way I don’t have to mess with clearml data - I am afraid to do something wrong and loose data

For me it is definitely reproducible 😄 But the codebase is quite large, I cannot share. The gist is the following:

import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
from clearml import Task
from tqdm import tqdm

task = Task.init("Debug memory leak", "reproduce")

def plot_data():
    fig, ax = plt.subplots(1, 1)
    t = np.arange(0., 5., 0.2)
    ax.plot(t, t, 'r--', t, t**2, 'bs', t, t**3, 'g^')
    return fig

for i in tqdm(range(1000), total=1000):
    fig = plot_data()
  ...

Hi SuccessfulKoala55 , will I be able to update all references to the old s3 bucket using this command?

Alright, I will try with that one

If I remove security_group_ids and just let subnet_id in the configuration, it is not taken into account (the instances are created in a the default subnet)

Alright, I had a look in the /tmp/.trains_agent_daemon_outabcdef.txt logs, not many insights from here. For the moment, I simply started a new trains-agent daemon in services mode and I will wait to see what happens.

and in the logs:
`
agent.worker_name = worker1
agent.force_git_ssh_protocol = false
agent.python_binary =
agent.package_manager.type = pip
agent.package_manager.pip_version = ==20.2.3
agent.package_manager.system_site_packages = true
agent.package_manager.force_upgrade = false
agent.package_manager.conda_channels.0 = pytorch
agent.package_manager.conda_channels.1 = conda-forge
agent.package_manager.conda_channels.2 = defaults
agent.package_manager.torch_nightly = false
agent.venvs_dir = /...

Nice, seems to work! 🎉

Alright, thanks SuccessfulKoala55 !

With a large enough number of iterations in the for loop, you should see the memory grow over time

Is there one?

No, I rather wanted to understand how it worked behind the scene 🙂

The latest RC (0.17.5rc6) moved all logs into separate subprocess to improve speed with pytorch dataloaders

That’s awesome!

CostlyOstrich36 I updated both agents to 1.1.2 and still go the same problem unfortunately. Since I can download the full log file from the Web UI, I guess the agents are reporting correctly?
Could it be that the elasticsearch does not return all the requested logs when it is queried from the WebUI to display it in the console?
Now that I think about it, I remember that on the changelog of the clearml-server 1.2.0 the following is listed:
` Fix UI Workers & Queues and Experiment Table pages ...

When running my training code

oh seems like it is not synced, thank you for noticing (it will be taken care immediately)

Thank you!

does not contain a specific wheel for cuda117 to x86, they use the pip defualt one

Yes so indeed they don't provide support for earlier cuda versions on latest torch versions. But I should still be able to install torch==1.11.0+cu115 even if I have cu117. Before that is what the clearml-agent was doing

I think we should switch back, and have a configuration to control which mechanism the agent uses , wdyt? (edited)

That sounds great!

RuntimeError: CUDA error: no kernel image is available for execution on the device

Could you please clarify? I don't get it

So the wheel that was working for me was this one: [torch-1.11.0+cu115-cp38-cp38-linux_x86_64.whl](https://download.pytorch.org/whl/cu115/torch-1.11.0%2Bcu115-cp38-cp38-linux_x86_64.whl)

So I suppose clearml-agent is not responsible, because it finds a wheel for torch 1.11.0 with cu117. It just happens that this wheel doesn't work in ec2 g5 instances suprizingly. Either I'll hardcode the correct wheel or I'll upgrade torch to 1.13.0

This is not the case, I downloaded it and I got a cuda error at runtime