can you get the agent to execute the task on the current conda env without setting up new environment?

Wouldn't that break easily ? Is this a way to avoid dockers, or a specific use case ?

is there any other way to get task from the queue running locally in the current conda env?

You mean including cloning the code etc. but not installing any python packages ?

(currently I think the implementation expects that if the download completed, it was successful)

Failing when passing the diff to the git command...

DilapidatedDucks58 I think they are used here:
https://github.com/allegroai/clearml/blob/3d3a835435cc2f01ff19fe0a58a8d7db10fd2de2/clearml/storage/helper.py#L1407

https://boto3.amazonaws.com/v1/documentation/api/latest/reference/core/session.html#boto3.session.Session.resource

It should be the last line (or almost) of the Log. is it there ? Also it seems that from the log, that trains you are using trains 0.14.3 , try with trains 0.15 , let me know if you are still missing packages

Hi @<1556812486840160256:profile|SuccessfulRaven86>
I'm assuming this relates to the SaaS service.
API calls are away to measure usage, basically metric reports are bunched into a single call, agents pings / query is API call, and so on so forth.
How many hours you had training tasks reporting data? how many agents running and so on

If you create an initial code base maybe we can merge it?

the parameter datatypes are not being changed when loading them up.

These are the auto logged parameters , inside YOLO, correct?
Just to make sure, you can actually see the value None in the UI, is that correct? (if everything works as expected, you should see empty string there)

Are Kwargs supported in functions decorated as a pipeline component?

They are, but I think the main issue is the casting, without prior knowledge, everything will be a tring

The issue is uploading reporting fro http uploads (object storage will report upload). Basically the http upload is post with urllib that does not support upload callbacks for progress report. If you have an idea here, we will gladly add it (as you mentioned it can be quite annoying to have to open network manager to verify the upload is progressing)

ModelCheckpoint('best_model', save_best_only=True)That worked for me now, what's the diff

Many thanks LazyLeopard18 ! 🙂

Hi StickyWhale51
I think this issue is due to some internal race condition, anyhow I think we have an RC out solving it, can you try with:
pip install clearml==1.2.0rc2

Hi SmallDeer34
Can you see it in TB ? and if so where ?

pip install clearml-agent==0.17.3rc0

understood trains does not have auto versioning

What do you mean auto versioning ?

task name is not unique, task ID is unique, you can have multiple tasks with the same name and you can edit the name post execution

Hmm that makes sense, btw the PYTHONPATH set by the agent would be the working dir listed under the Task, But if you set the agent.force_git_root_python_path the agent would also add the root git repo to the python path

we can add non-clearml code as a step in the pipeline controller.

Yes 🙂 , btw you can kind of already do that, with pre/post function callbacks (notice they are running from the same scope as the actual pipeline controller).
What exactly did you have in mind to put there ?

So clearml-init can be skipped, and I provide the users with a template and ask them to append the credentials at the top, is that right?

Correct

What about the "Credential verification" step in clearml-init command, that won't take place in this pipeline right, will that be a problem?

The verification test is basically making sure the credentials were copy pasted correctly.
You can achieve the same by just running the following in your python console:
` from clearml import Ta...

I was hoping that there's a universal flag somewhere. Asking this because I want all the Models and Artifacts to be stored in one place and the users shouldn't have to edit their configuration files.

You mean like make sure all models/artifacts are always uploaded?

. but when we try to do a "New Run" from UI, it tries to follow the DAG of previous run (the run with all child nodes skipped) and the new run fails too.

This is odd, is this reproducible ? what's the clearml python package version ?

I want to store only my raw data in my blob storage, and I want to create a Hyperdataset with all the artificats, metrics, frames,

Yes that's exactly how it works.
None

This line adds a reference to raw file (local/remote)
[https://github.com/allegroai/clearml/blob/1b474dc0b057b69c76bc2daa9eb8be927cb25efa[…]es/hyperdatasets/data-registration/register_dataset_wit...

New version will contain much more advanced search (including all the task fields)

are there any more fields in this function with partial matching? for example project? tags?

Yes they can all be filtered (basically everything you see in the UI)
notice: tags are strings (you can provide list of tags), project is an ID of the project
(Use Task.get_project_id, I think)

Hi SubstantialElk6

but in terms of data provenance, its not clear how i can associate the data versions with the processes that created it.

I think DeliciousBluewhale87 ’s approach is what we are aiming for, but with code.
So using clearml-data from CLI is basically storing/versioning of files (with differentiable based storage etc, but still).
What ou are after (I think) is in your preprocessing code using the programtic Dataset class, to create the Dataset from code, this a...

Yes that makes total sense to me. How about a GitHub issue on the clearml-docs ?

I see, so in theory you could call add_step with a pipeline parameter (i.e. pipe.add_parameter etc.)
But currently the implementation is such that if you are starting the pipeline from the UI
(i.e. rerunning it with a different argument), the pipeline DAG is deserialized from the Pipeline Task (the idea that one could control the entire DAG externally without changing the code)
I think a good idea would be to actually allow the pipeline class to have an argument saying always create from cod...

@<1523701523954012160:profile|ShallowCormorant89> can you verify it is reproducible in 1.9.3 ? because if it is I'd like to fix that 🙂

will it be possible for us to configure the "new run" button in a way so that it always clones from a particular pipeline ?

What do you mean by "particular pipeline" ? by default it will clone the last successful one, and by right clicking a specific one you can run a copy of that one. what am I missing ?

Hi @<1523701523954012160:profile|ShallowCormorant89>
This means the system did not detect any "iteration" reporting (think scalars) and it needs a time-series axis for the monitoring, so it just uses seconds from start

yes

argument saying always create from code

can be helpful

@<1523701523954012160:profile|ShallowCormorant89> any chance you can open a github issue on that, just so we do not forget ?

if we can edit the configuration objects of a pipeline, that can be beneficial too. which we're unable to do from UI

Actually you already can, after you clone the pipeline, you can press on details then go to configuration Tab, and edit the pipeline object. The format is HOCON (...

I should mention this is run within a TF v1 session context

This should not be connected.

everything gets stored as intended (to clearML dashboard)

So in jupyter it works? But from command line it does not ? what's the difference ?