Is there a reason 

clearml

 will use the demo server when there is no 

~/clearml.conf

?

It's the default server for easy getting started journey, e.g. you run some sample code and it works , with zero configuration.
that said you can set an environment flag to disable the default server behavior .
CLEARML_NO_DEFAULT_SERVER=1
ReassuredTiger98
wdyt?

BTW:

it will push potentially proprietary data to the public demo server.

The server if su...

What about output_uri?

If you are using StorageManager directly, output_uri is not relevant

Thanks!

seems working to me

Can you login to it?

DeliciousBluewhale87 could you send the new log?

Hi WearyLeopard29
Yes 🙂 this is exactly how it should work

So I would try: [-1, 60, 1]

Is there any references (vlog/blog) on deploying real-time model and do the continuous training pipeline in clear-ml?

Something along the lines of this one ?
https://clear.ml/blog/creating-a-fully-automatic-retraining-loop-using-clearml-data/
Or this one?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uNB6FKIi8Wg

Yes that should work, only thing is you need to call Task init on the master process (and make sure you call Task.current_task() on the subprocesses, if you want to automagic to kick in, that said, usually there is no need, they are supposed to report everything back to the main one anyhow
basically
` @call_parse
def main(
   gpus:Param("The GPUs to use for distributed training", str)='all',
   script:Param("Script to run", str, opt=False)='',
   args:Param("Args to pass to script", nargs=...

Hi @<1684010629741940736:profile|NonsensicalSparrow35>

however for the remote file it always creates the name with the following pattern:

{filename_prefix}checkpoint{n}.pt

..

Is this the main issue?
Notice that the model name (i.e. the entry on the Task itself) is not directly connected with the stored file name on the target file server (or S3)

BroadMole98 thank you for noticing !
I'll make sure it is fixed (a few other properties are also missing there, not sure why, I'll ask them to take a look)

I would recommend reading this blog post, it should give you a glimpse of what can be built 🙂
https://medium.com/pytorch/how-trigo-built-a-scalable-ai-development-deployment-pipeline-for-frictionless-retail-b583d25d0dd

Hi RoughTiger69
A. Yes makes total sense . Basically you can use Task.export Task.import to do achieve this process (notice we assume the dataset artifacts links are available on both, usually this is the case)

B. The easiest way would be to use Process , then one subprocess is exporting from dev , where the credentials and configuration is passed with os environment. The another subprocess imports it to the prod server (again with os environment pointing to the prod server). Make sense?

Cool, how will you be using it?

We suddenly have a need to setup our logging after every

task.close()

Hmm that gives me a handle on things, any chance it is easily reproducible ?

LOL I hear you 🙂

JitteryCoyote63 I think I found the bug in clearml-task it adds it at the end instead of before everything else

Hi LovelyHamster1 ,
you mean totally ignore the "installed packages" section, and only use the requirements.txt ?

Would it suffice to provide the git credentials ...

That should be enough, basically this is where they should be:
https://github.com/allegroai/clearml-agent/blob/0462af6a3d3ef6f2bc54fd08f0eb88f53a70724c/docs/clearml.conf#L18

LethalCentipede31 I think seaborn is using matplotlib, it should just work:
https://github.com/allegroai/clearml/blob/6a91374c2dd177b7bdf4c43efca8e6fb0d432648/examples/frameworks/matplotlib/matplotlib_example.py#L48

Thanks!
I think this one will cover both case (the issue is with files on the root of the dataset)
if not (fnmatch(k, path) and fnmatch(k if '/' in k else '/{}'.format(k), '*/' + wildcard))}

Hi DilapidatedDucks58

eg, we want max validation accuracy and all other metric values for the corresponding epoch

Is this the equivalent of nested sort ?
Wouldn't you get the requested behavior if you add all metric columns but sort based on the "accuracy" column ?

Okay, make sure that in your trains.conf on all the trains-agent machine you add the following:
agent.extra_docker_arguments: ["-v", "/etc/hosts:/etc/hosts",]

From here:
https://github.com/allegroai/trains-agent/blob/216b3e21790659467007957d26172698fd74e075/docs/trains.conf#L121

EcstaticGoat95 any chance you have an idea on how to reproduce? (even 1 out of 6 is a good start)

With pleasure, I'll make sure we officially release RC1 soon :)

for visibility, we continue here:
https://clearml.slack.com/archives/CTK20V944/p1671729558008189

I'll make sure we have conda ignore git:// packages, and pass them to the second pip stage.

Check the log to see exactly where it downloaded the torch from. Just making sure it used the right repository and did not default to the pip, where it might have gotten a CPU version...

PunySquid88 RC1 is out with a fix:
pip install trains-agent==0.14.2rc1