@<1545216070686609408:profile|EnthusiasticCow4> a PR would be greatly appreciated. If the problem lies in _query_tasks then it should be addressed there
Alright, I'll try and put that together for Monday.
The plot thickens. It seems like there's something odd going on with the interaction between [LTV] and additional text. If I just search [LTV] it works, if I just search Dataset Test it works, but if I put them together it breaks the search. Now that I think about it, there's other oddities that seem to happen in the web interface that might be explained by some bugs around using brackets in names.
I see. Thanks for the insight. That seems to be the case. I'm struggling a bit with datasets. For example, if I wanted to trace the genealogy of a dataset that's used by traditional tasks and pipelines. I'll try and write something up about the challenges around that when I get the chance. But your comment revealed another issue:
It appears that the partial name matching isn't going well. I'm unclear why this wouldn't be matching. In the attached photo you can see the input for partial_name is '[LTV] Dataset Test'
and you can see from the unfiltered search there are many datasets titled identically. Yet, with that search criteria I get 0 results. One would assume that a partial match would include perfect matches?
Yes, it indeed appears to be a regex issue. If I run:
Dataset.list_datasets(
dataset_project=self.task.get_project_name(),
partial_name=re.escape('[LTV] Dataset Test'),
only_completed=True,
)
It works as expected. I'm not sure how raw you want to leave the partial_name features. I could create a PR to fix this but would you want me to re.escape at the list_datasets() level? Or go deeper and do it at Task._query_tasks() level?
Hi @<1545216070686609408:profile|EnthusiasticCow4> ! Note that the Datasets section is created only if you get the dataset with an alias? are you sure that number_of_datasets_on_remote != 0 ?
If so, can you provide a short snippet that would help us reproduce? The code you posted looks fine to me, not sure what the problem could be.