The documentation is messy, I’ve complained about it the in the past too 🙈

@<1523701083040387072:profile|UnevenDolphin73> : I do not get this impression, because during update_weights I get the message

2023-02-21 13:54:49,185 - clearml.model - INFO - No output storage destination defined, registering local model C:\Users..._Demodaten_FF_2023-02-21_13-53-51.624362.model

But, I guess @<1523701070390366208:profile|CostlyOstrich36> wrote that in a different chat, right?

Unbelievable! That worked.

We'll try to add referenced to that in other places as well 👍

I wouldn't put past ClearML automation (a lot of stuff depend on certain suffixes), but I don't think that's the case here hmm

@<1523704157695905792:profile|VivaciousBadger56> regrading: None
Is this a discussion or PR ?
(general ranting is saved for our slack channel 🙂 )

Well you could start by setting the output_uri to True in Task.init .

I can only say I’ve found ClearML to be very helpful, even given the documentation issue.
I think they’ve been working on upgrading it for a while, hopefully something new comes out soon.
Maybe @<1523701205467926528:profile|AgitatedDove14> has further info 🙂

@<1523701087100473344:profile|SuccessfulKoala55> I think I might have made a mistake earlier - but not in the code I posted before. Now, I have the following situation:

• In my training Python process on my notebook I train the custom made model and put it on my harddrive as a zip file. Then I run the code

output_model = OutputModel(task=task, config_dict={...}, name=f"...")
output_model.update_weights(weights_filename=r"C:\path\to\mymodel.zip", is_package=True)

2. I delete the "C:\path\to\mymodel.zip", because it would not be available on my colleagues' computers.

3. In a second process, the model-inference process, I run

mymodel = task.models['output'][-1]
mymodel = mymodel.get_local_copy(extract_archive=True, raise_on_error=True)

and get the error

ValueError: Could not retrieve a local copy of model weights 8ad4db1561474c43b0747f7e69d241a6, failed downloading

I do not have an aws S3 instance or something like that. This is why I would like to store my mymodel.zip file directly on the ClearML Hosted Service. The model is around 2MB large.

How should I proceed?

🙂

Do you mean "exactly" as in "you finally got it" or in the sense of "yes, that was easy to miss"?

@<1523704157695905792:profile|VivaciousBadger56> It seems like whatever you pickled in the zip file relies on some additional files that are not pickled.

From the one you sent - None

FWIW, we prefer to set it in the agent’s configuration file, then it’s all automatic

@<1523701070390366208:profile|CostlyOstrich36>

My training outputs a model as a zip file. The way I save and load the zip file to make up my model is custom made (no library is directly used), because we invented the entire modelling ourselves. What I did so far:

output_model = OutputModel(task=..., config_dict={...}, name=f"...")
output_model.update_weights("C:\io__path\...", is_package=True)

and I am trying to load the model in a different Python process with

mymodel = task.models['output'][0]
mymodel = mymodel.get_local_copy(extract_archive=True, raise_on_error=True)

and I get in the clearml cache a . training.pt file, which seems to be some kind of archive. Inside I have two files named data.pkl and version and a folder with the two files named 86922176 and 86934640 .

I am not sure how to proceed after trying to use pickle, zip and joblib. I am kind of at a loss. I suspect, my original zip file might be somehow inside, but I am not sure.

Sure, we could simply use the generic artifacts sdk, but I would like to use the available terminological methods and functions.

How should I proceed?

Either? 🙂

I have already been trying to contribute (have three pull requests), but honestly I feel it is a bit weird, that I need to update a documentation about something I do not understand, while I actually try to evaluate if ClearML is the right tool for our company...

We have the following, works fine (we also use internal zip packaging for our models):

model = OutputModel(task=self.task, name=self.job_name, tags=kwargs.get('tags', self.task.get_tags()), framework=framework)
model.connect(task=self.task, name=self.job_name)
model.update_weights(weights_filename=cc_model.save())

I am not sure if it the fact the name of the file ends with .model is an issue - but that would be somewhat crazy design...

@<1523701083040387072:profile|UnevenDolphin73> : From which URL is your most recent screenshot?

We're certainly working hard on improving the documentation (and I do apologize for the frustrating experience)

Yes, you're correct, I misread the exception.
Maybe it hasn't completed uploading? At least for Datasets one needs to explicitly wait IIRC

@<1523701087100473344:profile|SuccessfulKoala55> : I referenced this conversation in the issue None

It is documented at None ... super deep in the code. If you don't know that output_uri in TASK's (!) init is relevant, you would never know...

But we do use S3

@<1523701087100473344:profile|SuccessfulKoala55> : That is the link I posted as well. But this should be mentioned also at places where it is about about the external or non-external storage. Also it should be mentioned everywhere we talk about models or artifacts etc. Not necessarily in details, but at least with a sentence and a link.

@<1523701083040387072:profile|UnevenDolphin73> : I see. I did not make the connection that output_uri=True is what I was missing. I thought this was the default. But the default is actually "None", which is different than "True".

missing a configuration option

Which one, where? Any idea? I did not set output_uri - do I have to do that?

I am refering to

• None
• None

@<1523704157695905792:profile|VivaciousBadger56> I'm not sure I'm following you - is the issue not being able to upload to the ClearML server or to load the downloaded file?