When I use the APIClient to fetch the tags for the project, I get an empty collection of system tags:

<projects.GetProjectTagsResponse: {
    "tags": [],
    "system_tags": []
}>

Aw you deleted your response fast CostlyOstrich36 xD

Indeed it does not appear in ps aux so I cannot simply kill it (or at least, find it).
I was wondering if it's maybe just a zombie in the server API or similar

And yes, our flow would break anyway with the internal references within the yaml file. It would be much simpler if we could specify the additional files

I'm not sure; the setup is not unique to Mac.
Each user has their own .env file which is given to the code entry point, and at some point will be loaded with dotenv.load_dotenv() .
The environment variables are not set in code anywhere, but the clearml.conf uses them directly.

JitteryCoyote63 yes exactly, sorry, I forgot to add the Task.get_task in my response. That's exactly what we do 😅

Exactly 🙂

I have selected the correct project indeed

@<1523701070390366208:profile|CostlyOstrich36> I added None btw

Would it also be loaded on e.g. Task.running_locally() ?

I can't seem to manage the first way around. If I select tasks in different projects, I don't get the bottom bar offering to compare between them

(in the current version, that is, we’d very much like to use them obviously :D)

Yeah I will probably end up archiving them for the time being (or deleting if possible?).

Otherwise (regarding the code question), I think it’s better if we continue the original thread, as it has a sample code snippet to illustrate what I’m trying to do.

Perfect, thanks for the answers Valeriano. These small stuff are missing from the documentation, but I now feel much more confident in setting this up.

Let me double check, one moment

Yes; I tried running it both outside venv and inside a venv. No idea why it uses 2.7?

Looks good! Why is it using an OutputModel and an InputModel?

We do not CostlyFox64 , but this is useful for the future 🙂 Thanks!
TimelyPenguin76 I'll have a look, one moment.

AgitatedDove14 The keys are there, and there is no specifically defined user in .gitmodules :
[submodule "xxx"] path = xxx url =I believe this has to do with how ClearML sets up the git credentials perhaps?

It is. Let me see what else I have set up for MinIO in configs, one moment

Am I making sense ?

No, not really. I don't see how task.connect_configuration interacts with our existing CLI? Additionally, the documentation for task.connect_configuration say the second argument is the name of a file, not the path to it? So something is off

We’re using karpenter (more magic keywords for me), so my understanding is that that will manage the scaling part.

Generally the StorageManager seems a bit slow, even a simple StorageManager.list(...) on a local path seems to take a long time

I guess it's mixed. If #340 is resolved, then this initializer task will be a no-op: detach, and init-close new tasks as needed.

It's a bit hard to read when they'll all clustered together:

Let me verify a hypothesis...

So maybe summarizing (sorry for the spam):

• Pipelines:- Pros: Automatic upload and serialization of input arguments
• Cons: Clutter, does not support classes, cannot inject code, does not recognize environment when run from e.g. IPython- Tasks:- Pros: Tidier and matches original idea, recognizes environment even when run from IPython
• Cons: Does not support classes, cannot inject code, does not automatically upload input arguments

Either? 🙂

Worked like a charm

Unfortunately I can't take a photo of not being able to compare tasks by navigating around the WebUI...

Does that clarify the issue CostlyOstrich36 ?

~ is a bit weird since it's not part of the package (might as well let the user go through clearml-init ), but using ${PWD} works! 👍 👍

(Though I still had to add the CLEARML_API_HOST and CLEARML_WEB_HOST ofc, or define them in the clearml.conf)