However, I actually do think I can already open the Huggingface PR in the meantime. It has actually relatively little to do with the second bug.

It's been accepted in master, but was not released yet indeed!

As for the other issue, it seems like we won't be adding support for non-string dict keys anytime soon. I'm thinking of adding a specific example/tutorial on how to work with Huggingface + ClearML so people can do it themselves.

For now (using the patch) the only thing you need to be careful about is to not connect a dict or object with ints as keys. If you do need to (e.g. ususally huggingface models need the id2label dict somewhere) just make sure to cast it to string before connecting it to ClearML and casting it back to int directly after. So that when ClearML changes the value, it's properly taken care of 🙂 My previous sample code is still valid!

I'm getting really weird behavior now, the task seems to report correctly with the patch... but the step doesn't say "uploading" when finished... there is a "return" artifact but it doesn't exist on S3 (our file server configuration)

I appreciate it!

BTW the code above is from clearml github so it’s the latest

I am currently on vacation, I'll ask my team mates. But if not I'll get to it next week

S3 as it should be

Hey @<1523701949617147904:profile|PricklyRaven28> , about the S3 loading issue. The path to the model in the artifact tab, is it an S3 bucket or a local path?

Hi @<1523701949617147904:profile|PricklyRaven28> just letting you know I still have this on my TODO, I'll update you as soon as I have something!

Allright, a bit of searching later and I've found 2 things:

• You were right about the task! I've staged a fix here . It basically detects whether a task is already running (e.g. from the pipelinedecorator component) and if so, uses that task instead. We should probably do this for all of our integrations.
• But then I found another bug. Basically the pipeline decorator task would mess up the internal nested dict of the label mapping inside of the model config. You will probably have the same issue if you run the pipeline with my fix above.
  So for now, we're looking into the 2nd bug, because it breaks with Hugging Face models in a pipeline. Until we sort that out, I'm going to hold off on opening a PR to HF with the first fix. Makes sense?

Thanks a lot for the example, it helped tons to be able to reproduce!

@<1523701435869433856:profile|SmugDolphin23> @<1523701087100473344:profile|SuccessfulKoala55> Yes, the second issue still consists, currently breaking our pipeline

Hi @<1523701949617147904:profile|PricklyRaven28> ! We released ClearmlSDK 1.9.1 yesterday. Can you please try it?

` from clearml.automation import PipelineDecorator
from clearml import TaskTypes

@PipelineDecorator.component(task_type=TaskTypes.data_processing, cache=True)
def run_demo():
from transformers import AutoTokenizer, DataCollatorForTokenClassification, AutoModelForTokenClassification, TrainingArguments, Trainer
from datasets import load_dataset

dataset = load_dataset("conllpp")

model_checkpoint = 'bert-base-cased'
lr = 2e-5
num_train_epochs  = 5
weight_decay = 0.01
seed = 1234

ner_feature = dataset["train"].features["ner_tags"]
label_names = ner_feature.feature.names
id2label = {str(i): label for i, label in enumerate(label_names)}
label2id = {v: k for k, v in id2label.items()}

tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_checkpoint)

data_collator = DataCollatorForTokenClassification(tokenizer=tokenizer)

model = AutoModelForTokenClassification.from_pretrained(
    model_checkpoint,
    id2label=id2label,
    label2id=label2id,
)
trainer_args = TrainingArguments(
    './tmp',
    evaluation_strategy="epoch",
    save_strategy="epoch",
    learning_rate=lr,
    num_train_epochs=num_train_epochs,
    weight_decay=weight_decay,
    seed=seed,
    data_seed=seed,
    load_best_model_at_end=True,
)

trainer = Trainer(
    model=model,
    args=trainer_args,
    train_dataset=dataset["train"],
    eval_dataset=dataset["validation"],
    data_collator=data_collator,
    tokenizer=tokenizer,
)
trainer.train()

@PipelineDecorator.pipeline(name="StuffToDelete", project=".Dev", version="0.0.2", pipeline_execution_queue="aws_cpu")
def pipeline():
run_demo()

if name == 'main':
PipelineDecorator.set_default_execution_queue("aws_cpu")

PipelineDecorator.run_locally()

pipeline() `

This isn’t a real working example, but it shows that on clearml 1.7.2 it passed initialization part (and has an error on training stuff which is ok)

And on 1.9.0 it errors before on
TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for +=: 'NoneType' and 'str'

i’ll try to work on something that works on 1.7.2

of course

SmugDolphin23 SuccessfulKoala55 ^

This is the next step not being able to find the output of the last step

ValueError: Could not retrieve a local copy of artifact return_object, failed downloading 

Just for reference, the main issue is that ClearML does not allow non-string types as dict keys for its configuration. Usually the labeling mapping does have ints as keys. Which is why we need to cast them to strings first, then pass them to ClearML then cast them back.

i believe this is because of this code
None

Which initialized the task if clearml is installed… but a task already exists (because of the pipeline), it will replace it

@<1523701949617147904:profile|PricklyRaven28> Please use this patch instead of the one previously shared. It excludes the dict hack :)

Nothing that i think is relevant, I'm using latest from master. It might be a new bug on their side, wasn't sure.

for now we downgraded to 1.7.2, but of course prefer not to stay that way

Hi PricklyRaven28 , can you try with 1.9.1rc0?

I tried to work on a reproducible script but then i get errors that my clearml task is already initialized (also doesn’t happen on 1.7.2)

SmugDolphin23 BTW, this is using clearml and huggingface’s automatic logging… didn’t log something manual

tnx! keep me posted

The version is v1.9.1

will check

Hi @<1523701949617147904:profile|PricklyRaven28> sorry that this is happening. I tried to run your minimal example, but get a IndexError: Invalid key: 5872 is out of bounds for size 0 error. That said, I get the same error without the code running in a pipeline. There seems to be no difference between simply running the code and the pipeline (for me). Do you have an updated example, maybe also including getting a local copy of an artifact, so I can check?

Looks like the first issue has been solved 🙂

i think the second one still consists, still checking