Examples: query, "exact match", wildcard*, wild?ard, wild*rd
Fuzzy search: cake~ (finds cakes, bake)
Term boost: "red velvet"^4, chocolate^2
Field grouping: tags:(+work -"fun-stuff")
Escaping: Escape characters +-&|!(){}[]^"~*?:\ with \, e.g. \+
Range search: properties.timestamp:[1587729413488 TO *] (inclusive), properties.title:{A TO Z}(excluding A and Z)
Combinations: chocolate AND vanilla, chocolate OR vanilla, (chocolate OR vanilla) NOT "vanilla pudding"
Field search: properties.title:"The Title" AND text
Answered
Hey, We Are Using Clearml 1.9.0 With Transformers 4.25.1… And We Started Getting Errors That Do Not Reproduce In Earlier Versions (Only Works In 1.7.2 All 1.8.X Don’T Work):

Hey,
We are using clearml 1.9.0 with transformers 4.25.1… and we started getting errors that do not reproduce in earlier versions (only works in 1.7.2 all 1.8.x don’t work):

File "/tmp/tmp0you5mai.py", line 29, in train_entity_exraction_model train(source=source_path.absolute(), output=model_output_path.absolute(), seed=seed, **entity_extraction_trainer) File "/usr/src/lib/entity_extractions/train.py", line 74, in train trainer.train() File "/opt/conda/lib/python3.10/site-packages/transformers/trainer.py", line 1527, in train return inner_training_loop( File "/opt/conda/lib/python3.10/site-packages/transformers/trainer.py", line 1704, in _inner_training_loop self.control = self.callback_handler.on_train_begin(args, self.state, self.control) File "/opt/conda/lib/python3.10/site-packages/transformers/trainer_callback.py", line 353, in on_train_begin return self.call_event("on_train_begin", args, state, control) File "/opt/conda/lib/python3.10/site-packages/transformers/trainer_callback.py", line 397, in call_event result = getattr(callback, event)( File "/opt/conda/lib/python3.10/site-packages/transformers/integrations.py", line 1355, in on_train_begin self.setup(args, state, model, tokenizer, **kwargs) File "/opt/conda/lib/python3.10/site-packages/transformers/integrations.py", line 1345, in setup self._clearml_task.connect(args, "Args") File "/opt/conda/lib/python3.10/site-packages/clearml/task.py", line 1480, in connect return method(mutable, name=name) File "/opt/conda/lib/python3.10/site-packages/clearml/task.py", line 3449, in _connect_object a_dict = self._connect_dictionary(a_dict, name) File "/opt/conda/lib/python3.10/site-packages/clearml/task.py", line 3413, in _connect_dictionary flat_dict = self._arguments.copy_to_dict(flat_dict, prefix=name) File "/opt/conda/lib/python3.10/site-packages/clearml/backend_interface/task/args.py", line 508, in copy_to_dict self._task.set_parameter((prefix or '') + k, v) File "/opt/conda/lib/python3.10/site-packages/clearml/backend_interface/task/task.py", line 1281, in set_parameter self._set_parameters( File "/opt/conda/lib/python3.10/site-packages/clearml/backend_interface/task/task.py", line 1246, in _set_parameters description=create_description(), File "/opt/conda/lib/python3.10/site-packages/clearml/backend_interface/task/task.py", line 1237, in create_description created_description += "Values:\n" + ",\n".join( TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for +=: 'NoneType' and 'str'

  
  
Posted 2 years ago
Votes Newest

Answers 62


Could you please run the misbehaving example, try to add a breakpoint in clearml/backend_interface/task/task.py in Task.update_output_model on the line with url = output_model.update_weights( , and tell me what the value of model_path is? In case you're using virtual environments, clearml library should be installed somewhere in <virtual env directory>/lib/python3.10/site-packages/clearml/

  
  
Posted 2 years ago

i believe this is because of transformer’s integration:

Automatic ClearML logging enabled.
ClearML Task has been initialized.

when a task already exists

  
  
Posted 2 years ago

@<1523701435869433856:profile|SmugDolphin23> @<1523701087100473344:profile|SuccessfulKoala55> Yes, the second issue still consists, currently breaking our pipeline

  
  
Posted 2 years ago

Hi PricklyRaven28 ! What dict do you connect? Do you have a small script we could use to reproduce?

  
  
Posted 2 years ago

Yes, and the old version only works without the patch.
I see the model on the artifacts tab, but it's not actually uploaded.

  
  
Posted 2 years ago

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/tmp/tmpxlf2zxb9.py", line 31, in <module>
    kwargs[k] = parent_task.get_parameters(cast=True)[return_section + '/' + artifact_name]
KeyError: 'return/return_object'
Setting pipeline controller Task as failed (due to failed steps) !
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/src/lib/clearml_test.py", line 69, in <module>
    pipeline()
  File "/opt/conda/lib/python3.10/site-packages/clearml/automation/controller.py", line 3914, in internal_decorator
    raise triggered_exception
  File "/opt/conda/lib/python3.10/site-packages/clearml/automation/controller.py", line 3891, in internal_decorator
    LazyEvalWrapper.trigger_all_remote_references()
  File "/opt/conda/lib/python3.10/site-packages/clearml/utilities/proxy_object.py", line 392, in trigger_all_remote_references
    func()
  File "/opt/conda/lib/python3.10/site-packages/clearml/automation/controller.py", line 3592, in results_reference
    raise ValueError(
ValueError: Pipeline step "second_step", Task ID=94a133dd0325425ab162467146482121 failed
  
  
Posted 2 years ago

SmugDolphin23 SuccessfulKoala55 ^

  
  
Posted 2 years ago

It should, but please check first. This is some code I quickly made for myself. It did make tests for it, but it would be nice to hear from someone else that it worked (as evidenced by the error above 😅 )

  
  
Posted 2 years ago

Thanks! I'm checking now, but might take a little (meeting in between)

  
  
Posted 2 years ago

hi, yes we tried with the same result

  
  
Posted 2 years ago

Hi PricklyRaven28 , can you try with 1.9.1rc0?

  
  
Posted 2 years ago

This is the next step not being able to find the output of the last step

ValueError: Could not retrieve a local copy of artifact return_object, failed downloading 
  
  
Posted 2 years ago

that makes more sense 🙂
would this work now as a workaround until the version is released?

  
  
Posted 2 years ago

I'm getting really weird behavior now, the task seems to report correctly with the patch... but the step doesn't say "uploading" when finished... there is a "return" artifact but it doesn't exist on S3 (our file server configuration)

  
  
Posted 2 years ago

tnx! keep me posted

  
  
Posted 2 years ago

@<1523701118159294464:profile|ExasperatedCrab78>
Hey 🙂
Any updates on this? We need to use a new version of transformers because of another bug they have in an old version. so we can’t use the old transformers version anymore.

  
  
Posted 2 years ago

@<1523701118159294464:profile|ExasperatedCrab78>
Hey again 🙂
I believe that the transformers patch wasn’t released yet right? we are getting into a problem where we need new features from transformers but can’t use because of this

  
  
Posted 2 years ago

I am currently on vacation, I'll ask my team mates. But if not I'll get to it next week

  
  
Posted 2 years ago

Now worries! Just so I understand fully though: you were already using the patch with success from my branch. Now that it has been merged into transformers main branch you installed it from there and that's when you started having issues with not saving models? Then installing transformers 4.21.3 fixes it (which should have the old clearml integration even before the patch?)

  
  
Posted 2 years ago

` from clearml.automation import PipelineDecorator
from clearml import TaskTypes

@PipelineDecorator.component(task_type=TaskTypes.data_processing, cache=True)
def run_demo():
from transformers import AutoTokenizer, DataCollatorForTokenClassification, AutoModelForTokenClassification, TrainingArguments, Trainer
from datasets import load_dataset

dataset = load_dataset("conllpp")

model_checkpoint = 'bert-base-cased'
lr = 2e-5
num_train_epochs  = 5
weight_decay = 0.01
seed = 1234

ner_feature = dataset["train"].features["ner_tags"]
label_names = ner_feature.feature.names
id2label = {str(i): label for i, label in enumerate(label_names)}
label2id = {v: k for k, v in id2label.items()}

tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_checkpoint)

data_collator = DataCollatorForTokenClassification(tokenizer=tokenizer)

model = AutoModelForTokenClassification.from_pretrained(
    model_checkpoint,
    id2label=id2label,
    label2id=label2id,
)
trainer_args = TrainingArguments(
    './tmp',
    evaluation_strategy="epoch",
    save_strategy="epoch",
    learning_rate=lr,
    num_train_epochs=num_train_epochs,
    weight_decay=weight_decay,
    seed=seed,
    data_seed=seed,
    load_best_model_at_end=True,
)

trainer = Trainer(
    model=model,
    args=trainer_args,
    train_dataset=dataset["train"],
    eval_dataset=dataset["validation"],
    data_collator=data_collator,
    tokenizer=tokenizer,
)
trainer.train()

@PipelineDecorator.pipeline(name="StuffToDelete", project=".Dev", version="0.0.2", pipeline_execution_queue="aws_cpu")
def pipeline():
run_demo()

if name == 'main':
PipelineDecorator.set_default_execution_queue("aws_cpu")

PipelineDecorator.run_locally()

pipeline() `

This isn’t a real working example, but it shows that on clearml 1.7.2 it passed initialization part (and has an error on training stuff which is ok)

And on 1.9.0 it errors before on
TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for +=: 'NoneType' and 'str'

  
  
Posted 2 years ago

Hey @<1523701949617147904:profile|PricklyRaven28> I'm checking! Have you updated anything else and on which exact commit of transformers are you now?

  
  
Posted 2 years ago

Looks like the first issue has been solved 🙂

i think the second one still consists, still checking

  
  
Posted 2 years ago

of course

  
  
Posted 2 years ago

confirming that only downgrading to transformers==4.21.3 without the patch worked....
This is a time bomb that eventually we won't be able to ignore... we will need to use new transformers code

  
  
Posted 2 years ago

S3 as it should be

  
  
Posted 2 years ago

thank Lior

  
  
Posted 2 years ago

yeah, it gets to that error because the previous issue is saved…i’ll try to work on a new example

  
  
Posted 2 years ago

sounds good 🙂 I’ll soon check if this fixes our issue and update you

  
  
Posted 2 years ago

We'll check it out 👍

  
  
Posted 2 years ago

Hi @<1523701949617147904:profile|PricklyRaven28> just letting you know I still have this on my TODO, I'll update you as soon as I have something!

  
  
Posted 2 years ago
170K Views
62 Answers
2 years ago
2 years ago
Tags
Similar posts